BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Make the best players actually desirable

Make the best players actually desirable

Set priority
Show messages by
From: darykjozef

To: Coco
This Post:
00
158188.278 in reply to 158188.277
Date: 1/29/2011 7:24:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
field that team... and win.

don't get too distracted by your silver trophies. winning is still the objective of the game.

You don't have any proof that is true.

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
This Post:
00
158188.280 in reply to 158188.273
Date: 1/29/2011 7:36:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
I think it would help.
1.6 million for one game or one week is a lot less attractive than 200 grand.


Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
From: aigidios

To: Coco
This Post:
00
158188.282 in reply to 158188.275
Date: 1/30/2011 4:57:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
Uh? That doesn't make sense to me. I don't mean this in a snarky way, I just don't see what point you're making. If you're saying that the new isolation tactics allow you to field a team with one superstar and 4 50k types, that just isn't true...


I believe (and hope) that you have much easier life if you pick up SF. Is probably enough to have just defences, rebounding and passing. And something like that could give you 4 50k players.

This Post:
22
158188.283 in reply to 158188.281
Date: 1/30/2011 6:54:51 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
458458
Is that a bad thing?

I don't know. It was just an idea. I think the ability to buy Superman for one game for $200k and sell him before you have to pay his wages is one of the most serious problems we currently face in this online game. To me it goes against any sort of fair play or ethics or whatever you want to call it. I know it's not illegal and there are plenty of people who think it's a good strategy. I just think it's bogus and makes things decidedly less fun.


Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
158188.284 in reply to 158188.283
Date: 1/30/2011 10:18:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
I think the market for 200k players is still pretty healthy and active - I was talking about those 350k+ centers that are tossed around like some hot piece of lava...

This Post:
00
158188.286 in reply to 158188.283
Date: 1/30/2011 12:20:51 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
I think that the teams should pay a daily salary for the players,but the payment of the total sum of salaries of all the roster during the week should remain however in one single weekly update.

This Post:
00
158188.288 in reply to 158188.287
Date: 1/30/2011 5:02:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
404404
Why nit have it so that a player that has played a game for you under any given week is payed for that week?

Because I think it would fit better to the divine trading situation,that basically is the problem here,rather than use a larger impact solution

Advertisement