The tiebreaker is not points scored, it's +/- points. Are you saying that good defence teams can not get a good +/- stat?
No, I am aware that the tiebreaker is +/- (points differential) and
I have no problem with that. What the original poster asked was what the tiebreaker
after +/- is, which is
total points.
I understand good defensive teams can get a good +/-. But they are at a huge disadvantage for total points if they're defensive focused. (Also keep in mind that the tactics - slower pace v.s. faster pace - using slower tactics doesnt mean a team is worse than a faster paced team. Just like focusing on defense doesnt mean a teams is worse than a team focused on offense.)
I understand the national cup problem, but the H2H is
at least reasonable and justifiable, if not fair (national cup creates other sacrifices too). A one-game playoff is in a neutral arena is justifiable too. So is using the 2 tied teams' records in the last half of the season (I understand the teams played are different). However, there is no justifiable argument for the
total points rule - it is not reasonable at all, because
it says nothing about which team is better (basketball is not a shooting competition; there is defense involved). It is not in basketball tradition either, so there is no reason to feel ashamed of not using it. The
total points tiebreaking rule is just an unfortunate and illogical rule implemented in the system.
Last edited by j9s3 at 12/15/2010 5:46:17 PM