BuzzerBeater
BuzzerBeater Forums
BB Global (English) > Interpretting game results
Back to the Sneak Peek
BB Global (English)
injured players, for how long?
10
Age
8
foul prone guards
5
last quarter overrun
6
Training issue....
3
scrimmage
3
friendly matches!!!!
1
Coaching
11
tournament draw
2
Game Engine
3
Team Stats bug
2
Yet an other match analysis th...
5
substitutions
2
Runtime error
3
Weekly Stats
6
Do scrimmages have spectators?
10
Offensive flow
4
Game not showing
1
Games not showing?
3
Interpretting game results
37
<
>
Favorite Folders
Interpretting game results
(thread closed)
Set priority
High
Normal
Low
Show messages by
Everybody
brian (1)
Demon Hoosier (1)
TigerUnderGlass (1)
ReDonkulous (1)
packer_22 (1)
LA-rlinney2001 (1)
goddo (1)
Your_Imaginary_Friend (3)
Search this Thread (Supporter Feature)
From:
Demon Hoosier
To:
brian
This Post:
0
7193.28
in reply to
7193.20
Date: 11/15/2007 11:39:01 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
98
Can't be.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
brian
To:
Demon Hoosier
This Post:
0
7193.29
in reply to
7193.28
Date: 11/16/2007 1:12:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
576
hehe..it really wasnt that big of an upset actually, looking back
"Well, no ones gonna top that." - http://tinyurl.com/noigttt
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
TigerUnderGlass
To:
Your_Imaginary_Friend
This Post:
0
7193.30
in reply to
7193.22
Date: 11/16/2007 1:14:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
15
Yes, I see it all now...by insulting me you have proven yourself the better man.
Try again though....of course I have read the definitions, but they are still a generalization, not an indicator of specific players skill levels, no matter how many times I read it.
An indicator of the performance of a combination of players against the defense of another combination of players will not tell you the specific skill ratings of specific players.
Hence my use of the term vague...get it?
...or should I just read it again to see if my dull unedumacated mind can grasp the concepts yet?
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
ReDonkulous
This Post:
0
7193.31
in reply to
7193.30
Date: 11/16/2007 1:29:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
50
Let's keep it civil, please.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
packer_22
To:
Your_Imaginary_Friend
This Post:
0
7193.32
in reply to
7193.25
Date: 11/16/2007 1:49:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
0
Well, if you had some spare time you could watch the game, so you could see, play by play, what your team was doing wrong. If you have a lot of turnovers, get better passing and handling. Out matched on the boards? Get some rebounding. I have found that the box score never lies, but ratings sometimes do. "Mediocre" is a vague term, but 3-17 from 3pt is pretty clear cut.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Your_Imaginary_Friend
To:
TigerUnderGlass
This Post:
0
7193.33
in reply to
7193.30
Date: 11/16/2007 2:35:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
0
>>..or should I just read it again to see if my dull unedumacated mind can grasp the concepts yet?<<
How's that worked for you so far?
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Your_Imaginary_Friend
To:
packer_22
This Post:
0
7193.34
in reply to
7193.32
Date: 11/16/2007 2:39:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
0
>>>Well, if you had some spare time you could watch the game, so you could see, play by play, what your team was doing wrong. If you have a lot of turnovers, get better passing and handling. Out matched on the boards? Get some rebounding. I have found that the box score never lies, but ratings sometimes do. "Mediocre" is a vague term, but 3-17 from 3pt is pretty clear cut.<<
Again, folks, I"m not complaining about losing. I'm pointing out the feedback from the game is painting a very poor picture of what happened.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
LA-rlinney2001
To:
Your_Imaginary_Friend
This Post:
0
7193.35
in reply to
7193.34
Date: 11/16/2007 10:39:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
0
Hm, I'm not going to comment on specific cases, but it is highly unlikely that BB is a game of pure Math. A random element must exist.
Upsets happen. You may have statistically played them off of the park, but I would assume that on odd occasions you will still lose. In these cases it will cause confusion (or as you put it "paints a very poor picture of what happened").
The picture painted may be poor, but
more often than not
if you win in the match ratings you will win the game. Please note, "more often than not", rather than "always" is a phrase I have chosen for a reason.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
goddo
To:
Your_Imaginary_Friend
This Post:
0
7193.36
in reply to
7193.1
Date: 11/16/2007 8:07:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
0
Friend, I see that we both get awful (high) ratings for offensive flow. Would you please tell me the skills of my starters and subs? Could you also help me to understand if I should compare my outside scoring to my opponents outside scoring or to his perimeter defense? I noticed you decided to play a 2-3 zone against a team with pitiful (med) inside scoring, was this decision a strong tactical one in your opinion?
One last question, my player Jessie Long (785965) has average rebounding, how is this possible since I didn't play him this week? He didn't get even one rebound so how can his rebounding be higher than Sheldon Heard, who has pitiful rebounding even though he grabbed 11 of them last week? Please construct your answers according to my preconceived ideas about what these things mean or I will insist they don't make any sense ;)
Mark Unread
Ignore User
From:
Your_Imaginary_Friend
To:
Your_Imaginary_Friend
This Post:
0
7193.37
in reply to
7193.1
Date: 11/17/2007 6:28:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
0
Today's announcement regarding changes to the offensive flow in the game engine address the issues I've brought up in this thread. I hope these changes fix the problems.
Mark Unread
Ignore User
Disable Emoticons and Images