BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > The usual OMG how did I lose that thread....

The usual OMG how did I lose that thread.... (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
14900.283 in reply to 14900.281
Date: 2/3/2009 6:45:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
If you are unsure about the result of a game, it's important to look at the Matchup Ratings. The points per 100 shots reflect the game better than the team ratings. As you see in that match, he dominated at SG/SF and C, en it was about evenly matched at PG.

The TIE vs CT makes up for the team ratings difference indeed, but it's more usefull to look at the Matchup ratings than the Team Ratings.

From: acarl

This Post:
00
14900.284 in reply to 14900.282
Date: 2/4/2009 12:15:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
what tactic do you think I should have chosen?

This Post:
00
14900.285 in reply to 14900.283
Date: 2/4/2009 12:18:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
did the TIE vs CT have an impact on the match up?

how can I avoid this happening again?

Also, my match ratings indicate that I should have dominated the outside scoring game and kept his inside shots out. How did he score so many?

This Post:
00
14900.286 in reply to 14900.285
Date: 2/4/2009 5:15:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
Sorry, I should have been more clear.

I think the written match ratings (mediocre(low)) etc aren't as accurate as the points per 100 shots ratings.

Lets take a look at your 100 shots ratings;

89.4 as PG 86.4 ---> This one is about evenly matched.
71.5 as SG 94.5 ---> He dominated your SG.
57.2 as SF 89.9 ---> He dominated your SF.
103.0 as PF 90.9 ----> You domnated his PF.
101.5 as C 119.5 ---> He dominated your C.

So he actually was better 1vs1 in 3 out of 5 position, and his PG was about equal.


This Post:
00
14900.288 in reply to 14900.287
Date: 2/4/2009 4:06:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
Of course. I was just trying to say that the written team ratings aren't the only thing to look at in the boxscore page.

This Post:
00
14900.289 in reply to 14900.288
Date: 2/4/2009 4:19:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
167167
you are right patje, i have told many people already, they are only an indication (a help). The real nummerical statistics are a way better indication of how your team played...

This Post:
00
14900.290 in reply to 14900.286
Date: 2/4/2009 6:23:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
so if I had played a man to man defense that might have helped out more? I would have gone directly to trying to shut down his players more than shutting down an area?

This Post:
00
14900.291 in reply to 14900.290
Date: 2/8/2009 10:52:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1212
http://www.buzzerbeater.com/BBWeb/boxscore.aspx?MatchID=8414753

epic screwjob for my opponent. im shocked i was within 20.


This Post:
00
14900.292 in reply to 14900.291
Date: 2/9/2009 4:36:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
you shouldn't have played with a slow offensive tactic, but I think your opponent stole you the match

Advertisement