BuzzerBeater Forums

Australia - I.1 > Season 16

Season 16

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
181476.282 in reply to 181476.281
Date: 7/25/2011 6:32:46 AM
Koopasaurus
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
300300
lol Fatty Dick is way more comical then Major Cock.

I wonder if its a reportable offense if someone does buy him off you for 1mil though. I mean I'm sure people will pay that for him just for the aesthetics side of the game.

This Post:
00
181476.283 in reply to 181476.282
Date: 7/25/2011 6:33:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
326326
Surely noone would bid a mill? ;)

When I say I'd bid, maybe 10K?

This Post:
00
181476.284 in reply to 181476.283
Date: 7/25/2011 6:35:02 AM
Koopasaurus
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
300300
haha maybe not 1mil.. thats a bit excessive.. but surely more then 10k!!

I've sold players with $800 salary for more then 10k before. Weird people value stuff like that.

This Post:
00
181476.285 in reply to 181476.284
Date: 7/25/2011 6:38:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
326326
Yeah, I reckon he'd go for more than 10K to, that's just all I'd bid

This Post:
00
181476.286 in reply to 181476.284
Date: 7/25/2011 6:39:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
485485
I've already had someone offer me 20k, maybe I can run a silent auction before listing him or something.

But I don't think I could bring myself to part with him .... the entertainment value is just too good .... damn shame he isn't worth training

This Post:
00
181476.287 in reply to 181476.285
Date: 7/25/2011 6:43:07 AM
Koopasaurus
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
300300
Looks like The Jets got a good rookie as well.
Siggy Jolly (21093241).

This Post:
00
181476.288 in reply to 181476.287
Date: 7/25/2011 6:46:05 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
275275
If only the BBs would let us change our rookie names without needing to win some comp with chances like 1 in 50k.
I need some troll names!
Siggy Trolly.
Troll Fartman.
Ur Jelly.
:(

Can you smell what the Hobos are cooking... oh wait its just Roger. (18085274)
This Post:
00
181476.289 in reply to 181476.288
Date: 7/25/2011 6:52:34 AM
Koopasaurus
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
300300
nah.. should name it Apu Nahasapeemapetilon

This Post:
00
181476.290 in reply to 181476.252
Date: 7/25/2011 7:50:59 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
536536

After spending several hundred thousand dollers on scouting this season I am bemused as to the draft picks that I received.

Some of my $40,000 per week went to investing in a group demonstration which I was under the impression highlighted all the players who had 1 or 2 ball potential.

The first 23 players I nominated did not show in the group demonstration so hence I assumed all would have had a potential greater than 1 or 2 ball.

Why did it occur that with my first pick being either the 3rd or 4th pick of the draft, the 3 draftees I ended up with were; "6th man" a "bench warmer" and a "starter"?

I am confused

Last edited by Sid Vicious at 7/25/2011 7:52:06 AM

This Post:
00
181476.291 in reply to 181476.290
Date: 7/28/2011 6:51:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
214214
I'm not sure what happened with your draft and sorry you didn't get anyone you liked out of your draft Sid. Just so i've got it clear though, you did make the 5 ball players your priority and put all the 1 and 2 ball players at the very bottom of your list?

This Post:
00
181476.292 in reply to 181476.291
Date: 7/28/2011 7:21:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
536536
Hi Dire thanks for the Bmail and commisserations to you on the demotion (I meant not winning the finals serious- It was my team that got demoted)

With regards to the draft I think I may have misunderstood what a "group demonstration" communicated.

The first 23 picks that I chose in the draft, did not appear for a group demonstration.

I assumed that by not showing for a group demonstration that it meant that a player had a potential higher than (1 or) 2 ball potential.

Obviously based on the fact that I got a "6th man" a "bench warmer" and a "starter", a group demonstration does not highlight by default those who do not attend, as being above a 2 ball potential.

Im curious as to what the attendance or non attendance to a Group Demonstration does prove?




Last edited by Sid Vicious at 7/28/2011 7:25:14 AM

Advertisement