BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Defense Strategy

Defense Strategy

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
10661.29 in reply to 10661.26
Date: 12/29/2007 11:28:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
7474
Here are the match IDs... It wasn't two games in a row, there was one game between them... You may study it by yourself... Srđan Pecelj, my starting PG didn't play the other game, that's where so big difference came from...

(1237273)
(2066016)

Enjoy:)

This Post:
00
10661.30 in reply to 10661.24
Date: 12/30/2007 7:04:39 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Both games home... Why are you asking???


If one game was home and one was away, that would account for a lot of the statistical difference.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
From: bull7

This Post:
00
10661.31 in reply to 10661.28
Date: 12/30/2007 12:30:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
Thanks for your help

This Post:
00
10661.33 in reply to 10661.32
Date: 12/30/2007 6:56:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
maybe this tactic worked because the opposition were pitiful rebounders?
If his rebounding was a couple levels higher your domination of the boards may have been less.

This Post:
00
10661.34 in reply to 10661.32
Date: 12/30/2007 7:25:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Endconclusion, if you play TIE, you should play 2:3 Zone...


I tend to do that myself, but it's much too simplistic to say "if you do tactic A, you should always also play tactic M"

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
10661.35 in reply to 10661.22
Date: 12/30/2007 7:29:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
20382038
with your weak perimeter de(awful high in your example)the most teams destroy you..2-3 Zone is only an option if your guards know what defense is..two examples for my thesis..in both games i am bader but i won the games..and my points stepped up in both games..(1036691),(1036752)

thats my 2 cents

Cheers Tom





Edited by TomStar (12/30/2007 7:41:00 PM CET)

Last edited by WillFreeman at 12/30/2007 7:41:00 PM

From: ned
This Post:
00
10661.37 in reply to 10661.36
Date: 12/30/2007 9:21:03 PM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
I think you didn't consider that is important to compare attack and defense but is important to consider also the rebounds. I've seen few games won by teams that had a minor percentage of rebounds and following the rules you've better chances to win the rebounds if you play 2-3. I still don't know how much should be the gap between attack and defense to cover the missing rebounds.

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
This Post:
00
10661.39 in reply to 10661.36
Date: 1/1/2008 1:06:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
Somebody said, the perimeter offense is too weak to hit 3 pointers.. so the tactic was to give them the open shots and it worked quite well...


you got lucky.
if the other team choose an outside attack, and fielded a few players with average jump shot and average shotrange or better (and there are many players around with these abilities) you might have swallowed a decent amount of 3-pointers.
Maybe ho would only get 40%, but still, if he takes 30 shots from outside, sinking 40%, that would be 36 points in 3-pointers.

I would never safely asume that what anyone says in the forums is the truth. I might believe it, and try it out, but I will always have to see for myself before taking it as a truth.
I am not convinced the players at this time are not capable of scoring 3-point shots. I played some outside offense a few times already, and am prety pleased with it...
Especially now that many teams are negecting outside D because there are no shooters yet, there are good possibilities out there...

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
Advertisement