BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Motion vs Run and Gun

Motion vs Run and Gun

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
175101.29 in reply to 175101.27
Date: 2/21/2011 3:52:57 AM
Arizona Cacti
III.8
Overall Posts Rated:
276276
I think Steve Nash would be more of a
JS: 20 JR: 17
OD: 7 BH: 17
DR: 15 PA: 20+
RB: 5
player with a weekly salary of ~ 230k $. :))


I'd say this is a really good evaluation and I cant find anything I'd fix. Don't forget the 20+ FT rating as well!

This Post:
00
175101.30 in reply to 175101.29
Date: 2/21/2011 5:58:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
344344
I would go with OD 11-12. He is bad on D but not that bad...

This Post:
00
175101.31 in reply to 175101.9
Date: 2/21/2011 10:15:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
good

Message deleted
From: Hadron

This Post:
00
175101.33 in reply to 175101.30
Date: 2/21/2011 6:31:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3333
Are you basing that on the recent Phoenix games? Seemed to me that he was putting in more of an effort on the defensive end.

This Post:
00
175101.34 in reply to 175101.11
Date: 2/22/2011 12:15:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
203203
Actually Princeton is my favorite outside offense because your PF and SF can make a lot of threes in addition to your guards. Also Princeton doesn't penalize offensive rebounding as much as motion and run and gun do. If you are a good rebounding team and a good shooting team (especially with good jump range), you can be a very tough with Princeton. Extra possessions + 3 Balls = Win.

Out of curiosity, why do you think that an offense that will produce fewer possessions and more high percentage shots (Princeton) needs more Rebounding than a fast paced offense that will produce more possessions and more low percentage shots (RNG)?