BuzzerBeater Forums

That's not what I did nor I said I did that. That's just your opinion of what you think I did. I have no reason to get into a discussion here since I don't have to explain to you what are the mechanisms of checking such things. Also, there is no reason for you to accuse me of lying without having any evidence to support it. You sure have some trust issues. Am I any different from other users on the forum? If you can't trust me on what I say, then can you really trust anyone for anything they say? Is there any sense of reading and writing on the forum if you think we are all liars? Maybe it's all just a big conspiracy against you and you alone!

Sorry, I'm not accusing you of anything. I'm just a realistic, educated programmer, knowing what it takes to "look into that" and make a conclusion that a mishap in this code-mixture (as other BBs clearly excuse) not has taken place. Sorry, but that is the truth when it comes down to running a type of game like this. Just don't make us look stupid. We can't always take a true story as a true story. That is what a tried to make a statement about. Not very smart, but although ... said is said!

This is a clear difference of views that will never be settled, no matter what I say or do. I have stated what I had to say and if you still don't believe me, that's your problem. Matter closed.

So we close.

stil I'd like to add somet stuff.

in the history of the game, there have been many bug reports.

many bug reports have been around for quite a time, before the where resolved. Either by checking things and see there was no bug, or by fixing an actual bug.
there is no reason for a BB to say they checked something, if they actually didn't check it. They just can't afford to do it. Because IF there realy would be a bug, those things would keep happening, and it's not good for the game, and therefor not good for them.
If such would be there policy, then why have there been so many bugs in the past that didn't get looked into in fast ways. Why would bugs stick around, until after a long time the BBs told us there was no bug after all? why didn't they just say so immediatly?
Because they do look into those things.

If we are talking about naive, then tell me why BB-Mark and BB-Charles are paying the other BBs salaries, just for not doing what they are hied to do? I suppose Mark and Charles can just as well react of the bugs they looked into them whitout having to pay extra BBs. Thinking BBs are being payed for not doing what they say they do ...well... that sounds a bit naive to me.

Fixing bugs might be timeconsuming. I am no programmer, but I do trouble solving in my job in my own way, and I know hours fly past before you know it. So I won't argue about that statement. But tracking and fixing bugs is BBs top priority, as they can't afford to keep runing erronous systems, and they know it.
I'd realy be surprised if they handle bug reports lightly...
that's my opinion