BuzzerBeater Forums

Thats why alot leave because they don't understand//

ALL I'm saying BB need to do more or the info side.. Everything is give and take 50/50// even the greatest chess secrets end up being told. It does not devalue the chess game it just open up ,more ways of play.. Now you have12 yrs olds todays that are grandmaster. Chess is played all over the world, many differ style and methods. BB is far from chess. more like yathzee.

I feel it should be more of chess than that.

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 10/30/2014 4:09:34 PM

I'm sorry to say but the BB"s are not here to tell us what to do to get this or that to work.

Nobody suggested anything like that, and with all due respect, your response is defensive and not befitting a BB. The BB's are also not here to produce gibberish that nobody can understand.

If you can do no better than:
" C / PF
SF / PF (80%)
SG / SF (70%)
PG / SG (60%)
C / PF / SF "
completely without any explanation of what that is supposed to mean, then you would do better never to have published that. It merely confuses everyone and frustrates many newbies. You created second teams to get more revenue, and then you drive people away like this. Not smart.

The game is BasketBall, not "Guess What the BB's Are Doing Next." Seriously, consider explaining yourselves so we can play basketball, not waste everybody's time deciphering gibberish.

Thank you.

Last edited by Mike Franks at 10/31/2014 12:47:01 AM

Based on two weeks of 2-position training, it looks to me like training is overall more effective this season. We've been asking 80% of what...and I think the "what" is higher than it was before. Which makes sense, or else the off-position, less-effective training would be a total waste of time.

You think regular training has become faster based on 2 weeks of training? Don't you think that's a rather small sample size?

Yes and yes. I got 7 pops in 2 weeks for 5 players training. Maybe they were all on the verge of popping anyway. But it's much better than anything last season. For what it's worth.

Last edited by Scoresby at 10/31/2014 12:53:24 PM

You mis understood. A man made the game of chess and he was a player, the 1st player at that.? He was a player that had knowledge of this or that in chess to start. Not all of it, but his tactic''s were a start of that.? Player's expanded many ways upon his tactics . In BB that is not the case. BB need to start being more transparent like the starting master ( creator), like many chess masters in chess . Creator and player is no different.

Share some of the wealth of knowledge.. What is good the creation if its never shares the beauty of it in hidden things in certain parts.

The thing that get me the most is ,once some share some knowledge. Its how many titles you have, how many b3 titles you have.? Knowledge is not based out right success, but by trial and error. The BB creator know how to play the game and all tactic correctly.. With the proper players for them.

I don't know if they were here made to start, but I assume not. where are they today?? why none know how to play certain defense/offense's correctly? A tutor can teach only so much, its up to the student to expand on that teaching to create and evolve.. Its not the tutor job to say his student is false in assertion. How will things taught every evolve for the game?? Like you said its build on the player knowledge?

Nothing wrong with telling thing. It open more style of play in BB case more tactics to play. the market with more better player diversity. The gave evolve. If something is made by the creator hand it mostly end by the creator as well.. the reason why chess has not fallen off is because they started to tell certain things.

Last edited by Mr. Glass at 10/31/2014 2:08:48 PM