BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Precision about National Teams and their coach

Precision about National Teams and their coach

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
280839.29 in reply to 280839.28
Date: 8/4/2016 11:21:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
Please refer to the suggestions forum about this issue.

This Post:
00
280839.32 in reply to 280839.27
Date: 8/5/2016 10:57:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6262
Think of this as real life. Between the USA and the NBA. The USA NT is full of NBA stars. If we based this off of what you have suggested, you are saying that the USA NT could force the NBA team to drop their player from their team because the USA NT for the Olympics in Rio aren't happy with the game shape of the athlete.

With that in mind, you're saying that an NBA team should be forced to drop a star player they pay a multi-year, multi-million dollar contract to just because their game shape isn't up to par for the USA NT. The USA NT doesn't even pay the athlete anything compared to what their club team pays.

Sadly you're in a micro nation and that sucks. If you have a problem with that then start recruiting your friends and people in your nation and make it a macro nation.

More along the lines of the original topic, I think this is a great idea as long as it's based mainly on elected Managers not being active or becoming bots. It would not be a very positive atmosphere if an elected Manager got fired because 75% disapprove of the Manager. If you don't approve then wait for his term to be over and never elect him again. That's the point of elected officials, you elect them based on their ability and if you're wrong then wait for the next term until you can elect someone else in. But it sounds like this would not be the case. Thanks for writing this in the code! Great idea.




Quoted whole thing on phone sorry.

Well in the past NBA players weren't allowed only "amateur athletes". So, while your points are strong and valid. A different perspective would be that's only an issue because the olympics changed to allow professionals to play Basketball and Hoxkey etc. if it's only armatuers.... Is that so unreasonable a thing to ask a high school or college?

This Post:
00
280839.33 in reply to 280839.32
Date: 8/5/2016 11:31:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
Amateur is a player or athletes who participates in a sport, on an unpaid basis.

If our club athletes were not paid then yes, it would be reasonable for the U21 or NT to take control of their amateur athletes for the betterment of the country. So your example of amateurs is a good thought but it does not correlate with the athletes on club teams.

Club athletes do get paid by their clubs and are managed by their clubs solely for the betterment of their clubs. It is sad that some managers don't stay active or don't train the athlete to its fullest extent but that's on the club and not the U21/NT to take control.

This Post:
33
280839.34 in reply to 280839.33
Date: 8/6/2016 2:02:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
221221
That's easy to say when there's 1200+ other clubs.

This Post:
00
280839.35 in reply to 280839.34
Date: 8/6/2016 11:23:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
It's easy to say when it's a stupid argument. No manager would agree to give up their 150TSP athlete because their NT wants to steal them. If the player does have 150TSP, that means the club team spent YEARS(literally 3-4 years real life) and MILLIONS on the athlete to get him to where they are now. How do NT Managers have the right to steal these players from their clubs for the NT when the Manager of the athlete doesn't care for the athlete being on the NT with good GS.

I'm done arguing about this over the wrong topic post. This should not keep being discussed on this forum.

Last edited by George Johnson at 8/6/2016 11:32:33 AM

This Post:
00
280839.36 in reply to 280839.35
Date: 8/6/2016 4:48:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
16031603
The 150 TSP guy we are talking about was sold to a manager wasting him. No stealing whatsoever necessary if GS was fixed. Fair solution in my opinion.

Größter Knecht aller Zeiten aka His Excellency aka President for Life aka Field Marshal Al Hadji aka Lord of All the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Seas aka aka Conqueror of the Buzzerbeater Empire in Europe in General and Austria in Particular
This Post:
00
280839.37 in reply to 280839.35
Date: 8/6/2016 9:27:18 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
6262
It's easy to say when it's a stupid argument. No manager would agree to give up their 150TSP athlete because their NT wants to steal them. If the player does have 150TSP, that means the club team spent YEARS(literally 3-4 years real life) and MILLIONS on the athlete to get him to where they are now. How do NT Managers have the right to steal these players from their clubs for the NT when the Manager of the athlete doesn't care for the athlete being on the NT with good GS.

I'm done arguing about this over the wrong topic post. This should not keep being discussed on this forum.


Patriots. Gave up Nate Ebner from training camp, OTAs, and preseason for Olympics for Rugby.

NBA. Warriors do run risk of Durant and Klay getting hurt....
It's all about perspective


Last edited by RamenQueen at 8/6/2016 9:29:59 PM

This Post:
00
280839.38 in reply to 280839.37
Date: 8/6/2016 10:31:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
USA NBA best Lebron and Curry aren't forced to play on team USA. Point proven. NBA first, not NT.

This Post:
00
280839.39 in reply to 280839.38
Date: 8/7/2016 12:47:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
6262
USA NBA best Lebron and Curry aren't forced to play on team USA. Point proven. NBA first, not NT.

I disagree that this proves your point.

If USA "needed" LeBron and Steph to win it all, which they don't, then it would prove your point.

Instead I feel you are proving the other guys point that a Micro where they absolutely NEED the players NT before club.
For a team overflowing with more talent and pools of talent to pick from. Not the end of the world.

Advertisement