BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Training Positions

Training Positions

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
7590.29 in reply to 7590.28
Date: 6/20/2008 8:27:29 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
One problem with people who say "just use the scrimmage" is how minutes affect gameshape. Isn't 91+ the cutoff where a player goes from a good gain to a loss? I'll throw my 2c in and say let us train any 1/2 positions or the whole team in anything.

This Post:
00
7590.30 in reply to 7590.29
Date: 11/6/2009 1:11:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
I have seen this thread now so I decided (maybe a little late) to give you my suggestions...
many of them may be same as they are now
Team Training
Game Shape
Free Throws
Stamina

Pressure
PG
SG
Guards
Wingmen
Team

Shot Blocking
C
PF
C/PF
PF/SF
Team

Inside Defence
C
PF
C/PF
PF/SF
Team

Rebounding
C
PF
C/PF
Team

Inside Scoring
C
PF
C/PF
PF/SF
Team

One on One (For me the best training)
SG
SF
Wingmen
Guards
Forwards
Team

Outside Shooting
SG
Guards
Wingmen
Team

Jump Shot
SG
SF
Guards
Wingmen
Team

Ball Handling
PG
Guards
Wingmen
Team

Passes
PG
Guards
Team

This Post:
00
7590.31 in reply to 7590.30
Date: 11/6/2009 8:28:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
I highly disagree, your scheme of training makes it far to easy. Training is suppose to be a bit of a challenge.

This Post:
00
7590.32 in reply to 7590.31
Date: 11/7/2009 3:12:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
Yes, but this way, a PF will never get an individual training (except from playing him Center, in which position he may do not be so good)

This Post:
00
7590.33 in reply to 7590.32
Date: 11/7/2009 3:52:32 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3838
Consider yourself blessed if that is your biggest training problem. Try training SF's. That's what I do. Still I would not have the training system in any other way. The higher price you can get on PL for a well developed SF should reflect the extra effort that goes into training them. I think the things that make you take tough choices is what makes BB appealing.

This Post:
00
7590.34 in reply to 7590.33
Date: 11/7/2009 4:01:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
Well, I train Centers and Point Guards (one week C's the other PG's) but what if I buy a tall 18-year-old rookie with better outside skills (Point Forward). He will not be able to play Center, but he is still good and trainable...

This Post:
00
7590.35 in reply to 7590.34
Date: 11/7/2009 4:20:11 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3838
I think that is a smart way to train. Even if it takes a little longer to get the primary skills up than if he were better in inside to begin with, it is a faster way to train a tall PF, since he excels quicker in inside training forms, and you don't have to spend so much time training the (for him) slower outside training methods.

In the beginning you may have a challenge fitting him into games with hard competition, but it always takes time for a new player to become good.

Last edited by Svett Sleik (U21-Scout Norge) at 11/7/2009 4:23:31 AM

This Post:
00
7590.36 in reply to 7590.35
Date: 11/7/2009 4:24:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
And this is what I'm planning to do with a player at the end of the season... but, with the current training programm is a bit difficult...

This Post:
00
7590.37 in reply to 7590.36
Date: 11/7/2009 9:17:37 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
And this is what I'm planning to do with a player at the end of the season... but, with the current training programm is a bit difficult...


with could it also make it fun to master the situtuation, and for such rotations you also had scrimmages, and in Cup time is it also today difficult to go in three games for a win for most teams so use your weak game for training him.

This Post:
00
7590.38 in reply to 7590.36
Date: 11/7/2009 9:32:13 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
112112
"Nothing in the world is worth having or worth doing unless it means effort, pain, difficulty... I have never in my life envied a human being who led an easy life. I have envied a great many people who led diffcult lives and led them well."
-Teddy Roosevelt