BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Economy - Next steps

Economy - Next steps

Set priority
Show messages by
From: ned

This Post:
00
102952.3 in reply to 102952.2
Date: 7/27/2009 9:36:22 AM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
so at the end in this case these changes were made only to put money on the market? I thought everything was done to balance better the economy and I'm sure that somewhere the BBs have written that will be not anymore convenient to have an arena of 60.000 seats.
A little OT about Ikstens, I think is impossible to keep similar player in roster if the salary will raise with an exponential system; next season if trained all the season as center he could have 500k/week of salary O_o"

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
From: CrazyEye

To: ned
This Post:
00
102952.4 in reply to 102952.3
Date: 7/27/2009 9:39:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
so at the end in this case these changes were made only to put money on the market?


i don't know why exactly they are made, but one reason was to avoid farming in making star player still attractive for the top leagues. And taking the crying italians, a chanche to stay in frotn of the manager who choose a long term strategy, without making their rooster temporary weaker.

From: ned

This Post:
00
102952.5 in reply to 102952.4
Date: 7/27/2009 9:48:52 AM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
so at the end the italians won against the economy based on the construction done by germans?

We will see other opinion these changes I thought were made to avoid that a team like torooo (just for example) will continue to make money thanks to the low competition, big arena and not so expensive roster. In your bundesliga there is a team that earns 430k/week, for sure he's a great manager and for sure in other countries people decided to invest in the arena but till now both strategy could be valid, invest on the arena or on the roster. Only now is completely clear that the first choice was much better, as written before I think an arena of 25-30k seats could be the best, if you think having a Maracanà stadium in Ausburg probably is more than enough

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
From: CrazyEye

To: ned
This Post:
00
102952.6 in reply to 102952.5
Date: 7/27/2009 9:55:12 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
We will see other opinion these changes I thought were made to avoid that a team like torooo (just for example) will continue to make money thanks to the low competition, big arena and not so expensive roster.


we'll see, maybe the other contribution with more marketing and less visitors make the gap smaller betwenn succesfull teams and unsuccesfull teams. I don't watch torooo's rooster for a while, but is his rooster really cheap?

From: ned

This Post:
00
102952.7 in reply to 102952.6
Date: 7/27/2009 10:04:15 AM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
Not now... He should pay about 640k/week, before to buy Romagnoli he has a roster similar to ours speaking about salary.

Anyway I don't want to focus my attention to the arena, now I should earn about 30k/week, with these money I will update mine and in the year 2020, I'll be the same arena that you
What do you think about marchanding related to the power to the player you've in roster? How do you think he will be implemented?

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
From: CrazyEye

To: ned
This Post:
00
102952.8 in reply to 102952.7
Date: 7/27/2009 10:05:45 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
I think it will basing on salary with an Bonus for NT players, but to be honest i have no idea how they do it really^^

From: Pallu

To: ned
This Post:
00
102952.9 in reply to 102952.5
Date: 7/27/2009 10:06:15 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2525
(...) invest on the arena or on the roster. Only now is completely clear that the first choice was much better, (...)


I disagree. All those that invested in roster without thinking about financial consequences (wages) are now happy. TV-Revenues are an immediate payback based on wages - and Arena revenues will be cut soon.

A very populist measure to keep everybody (who overspent) happy.

From: ned

This Post:
00
102952.10 in reply to 102952.9
Date: 7/27/2009 10:09:42 AM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
Once again, for me it's ok also to give a premium to everyone that invested in the arena but we should have a stop in the buildings, 60k, 100k but at the end we can't continue to raise the gap increasing the arena. As far as I know who has the big arena can now sell the seats and having back the money.

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
From: CrazyEye

To: ned
This Post:
00
102952.11 in reply to 102952.10
Date: 7/27/2009 10:14:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Once again, for me it's ok also to give a premium to everyone that invested in the arena but we should have a stop in the buildings


we had one, the tall blacks reached it for example in the VIP section(or nearly) with hundreds seats. And the investment was huge, for a small advantage against my 50 seats so i also don't expect much teams to build their arena to the end.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 7/27/2009 10:14:58 AM

From: Pallu

To: ned
This Post:
00
102952.12 in reply to 102952.10
Date: 7/27/2009 10:17:10 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2525

Taking some action against huge Arenas was reasonable.

I just don't like the idea that two ways of extreme management (huge arenas or overspending on wages) are treated differently. Arena style is cut, wage style is subsidied.


From: rwystyrk

This Post:
00
102952.13 in reply to 102952.12
Date: 7/27/2009 10:53:37 AM
BC Hostivař
II.2
Overall Posts Rated:
12031203
Second Team:
Jirkov
I don't agree that taking action against huge Arenas was reasonable. Because building too large arenas wasn't reasonable, bacause of lower ticket prices.

For example comparing my team and Tall Blacks. He invest to the arena about 9M $ dollars more than me. This month he gains 673k for match with good Fan Survey, 543k for match with worse Fan Survey. I earned 555k for match with good Fan Survey.
This season I have had all the matches fans in good mood (except of round 1 after Fan Survey reset). He plays 3 times (tomorrow next one) with bad mood and 4 times with good mood. Last season he plays 6 times in good fans mood and 5 times in bad mood. And in playoff he plays only 1 away match.
My team played only 1 match in bad mood (and again 1 match in reseted mood) and 9 times in good mood. And I played 4 home and 1 away match in playoff.
So it takes him very long time to give his 9M $ back. Maybe he would not gain him at all.

In my eyes even without planned changes it wasn't reasonable to build arena larger than something around 30k.

Advertisement