BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Forum day - Tactics

Forum day - Tactics

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
112406.3 in reply to 112406.2
Date: 9/19/2009 3:02:38 PM
1986 Celtics
IV.21
Overall Posts Rated:
88
you mean like you want to tell this player, shoot less.. or this player shoot more?

From: modred
This Post:
00
112406.4 in reply to 112406.3
Date: 9/19/2009 3:05:14 PM
Myopic Marauders
III.8
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
you mean like you want to tell this player, shoot less.. or this player shoot more?


yes. Or this player to try to drive to the basket instead of taking the jump shot. Or this player never to get more than 3 feet from the paint.

This Post:
00
112406.5 in reply to 112406.4
Date: 9/19/2009 3:08:56 PM
1986 Celtics
IV.21
Overall Posts Rated:
88
I think we would need to think about additional adjustements to prevent these advanced tactics from creating messed up game play... like if things got out of control and only two players took shots all game, or something like that, where its clear that a real team playing against that opponent would adjust in a way to make the tactics they were trying to accomplish impossible. So we'd have a lot of things to tune to get these things really right. I think right now that would be a pretty large change in the GE and so we aren't inclined to do it. If it all worked perfectly it would be cool.. but I see a lot of opportunities for certain combinations of lineups and tactics becoming dominant in that kind of system, and we want to make sure that multiple strategies are all viable, and there is no "right" answer.

Last edited by BB-Forrest at 9/19/2009 3:10:22 PM

From: modred
This Post:
00
112406.7 in reply to 112406.5
Date: 9/19/2009 4:20:51 PM
Myopic Marauders
III.8
Overall Posts Rated:
2424
How about some realism about how many three's a center with no jump shot will take...? :-)

Understood about the individual player tactics, so what about more control over when substitutions take place?

From: ned

This Post:
00
112406.8 in reply to 112406.6
Date: 9/19/2009 4:27:08 PM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
josef please have a look the final games of the National teams, do you think all the coaches are crazies?
If you play against a weakerx3 team you can't compare exactly what I'm saying, you must apply your theory with teams similar to yours with the same enthusiasm (for your today match you can cancel from your "wrong and wrong") and if possible making some stats about what you're saying, I'm sorry but I prefer to listen the opinion of Forrest about it without offense of course ;)

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
From: ned

This Post:
00
112406.10 in reply to 112406.9
Date: 9/19/2009 4:49:27 PM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
of course josef and I repeat nothing against you but it's hard for me listen someone saying that princeton is a winning tactic when I see one of your match: (15719332) in the same game you can see that 3-2 is not given you any bonus, lakers scored with almost 50% so at the end I know some teams in bundesliga one of them was Lakers, I will see your tactis against the others than we can drop us a line each other. Personally I've closed my experience with princeton with this match: (6248329), when I say that 3-2 or in general having the "correct" tactic don't give a bonus I speak about games like this: (13117674) and in any case in general m2m is the easier tactic to choice cause you can't be wrong, instead when you chose to defend 2-3 you're risking to waste a victory if the other team plays r&g that's why I hope the correct tactic will be more important for the future ;)

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et