BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Training Help, PLZ help!

Training Help, PLZ help!

Set priority
Show messages by
From: ShackMan

This Post:
00
140145.3 in reply to 140145.2
Date: 4/10/2010 6:46:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Thanks for the reply, im pretty sad to hear that ( Not only from you) That Jones Can't be trained, I have a few 18 yr olds so I guess I'll start with them, thanks for the Help!

This Post:
00
140145.4 in reply to 140145.3
Date: 4/10/2010 9:12:25 PM
Aussie Pride
ABBL
Overall Posts Rated:
544544
The 18 year olds u have are only bench warmer so wouldn't be worth training. The best guy you have to train looks like Zurlo your 19 year old SG. I would look to buy some more 18-19 year old guards. Potential doesn't have to be that high around star should suffice. Depends how much money u have but if i can get about 4 more guards you should do 2 position guard training ie PG/SG. If u can only afford to buy a couple more guards then do 1 position training until u get a couple more guys in possibly through the draft next season or when u have more money this season. Generally i think 2 position training is better when your new.

This Post:
00
140145.5 in reply to 140145.4
Date: 4/11/2010 8:55:30 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Generally i think 2 position training is better when your new.


I would like to know on what basis you think so.

Last edited by CorruptCop at 4/11/2010 8:56:44 AM

This Post:
00
140145.6 in reply to 140145.5
Date: 4/11/2010 9:01:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
I also agree with aussie dude.

I think that when you are new you don't have many good players, so it is better if you train 5 or 6 players at 2 positions because then you have 5 or 6 players that are constantly improving and 2 position training isn't that much less effective than 1 position training.

If new teams do 1 position training, then they are only improving 3 players while the rest of the team would still suck.

Why do you think 1 position training is better?

This Post:
00
140145.7 in reply to 140145.6
Date: 4/11/2010 9:13:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I do not necessarily believe 1 position is better, although it is the approach I am taking currently.

However I am always interested in learning and hearing other points of view so thoughts on why 2 position training is more beneficial may make me reconsider what I am doing.

This Post:
00
140145.8 in reply to 140145.7
Date: 4/11/2010 9:15:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
Okay. Well last season was my first season, I did 2 position training the whole season on young guys (18-21). I had 6 young guys. I had 6 cheap older guys to fill the other spots. At the end of the season I sold all of them for lots of money after I promoted. This season I got a very good draftee and I want to train him for the national team, so I am 1 position training this season, and with all the money I had I bought a bunch of older guys for the other spots.

This Post:
00
140145.9 in reply to 140145.8
Date: 4/11/2010 9:39:27 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
Well can't knock the approach. From my limited experience, your team looks pretty strong for one just over a season old.

This Post:
00
140145.10 in reply to 140145.9
Date: 4/11/2010 9:45:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
Thanks :)

This Post:
00
140145.11 in reply to 140145.7
Date: 4/11/2010 11:51:51 AM
Aussie Pride
ABBL
Overall Posts Rated:
544544
Well 2 position training gives you more total training then 1 position training it is just spread across more players. When your new and in the lower divisions i think a solid even team is enough to promote. It's more in the higher divisions where the 1 position trained stars with the high potential become more important. It's also a money thing if your doing 1 position training wages will rise fast especially on big men. It will also cost more to buy trainees because if u are doing 1 position training you will want high potential guys so you can train them for longer.

Last edited by aussie dude at 4/11/2010 11:52:49 AM

This Post:
00
140145.12 in reply to 140145.11
Date: 4/11/2010 12:24:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
It seems by that logic team training various attributes would be even better.

This Post:
00
140145.13 in reply to 140145.12
Date: 4/11/2010 12:32:06 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
No, because team training is wayyyyy too slow. Look at it this way: 3 players x full training = 3 full training for 1 position
For 2 position: 6 players x 70% training of 1 position = 4.2 players worth of full training.
For team training: 12 players x 15% training of 1 position = 1.8 players worth of full training. And personally I think that 15% is being generous.

So as you can see, 2 position training is the best for the team.

Advertisement