BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Point Guards in Buzzerbeater

Point Guards in Buzzerbeater (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
155542.3 in reply to 155542.2
Date: 8/29/2010 2:51:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3333
Perhaps, but the stats should still be higher than they are. There should at least be some PGs with close to 10 APG for the season.

I didn't have to look far to counter your point anyway. Check out this player (6849654) from a team in my league. They play look inside with decent flow by the standards of my league. Shouldn't he be dishing out a few more assists?

From: Stajan

This Post:
00
155542.4 in reply to 155542.2
Date: 8/29/2010 2:57:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
146146
The frequency of players with tremendous or higher rebounding or jump shot far surpasses those with even prominent or higher passing from what I can see. Passing is being insufficiently developed through all of BB. I think in a previous state of the sim, passing wasn't particularly useful. It seems useful to me now, and has since I started playing a few seasons ago. My passing is still poor, though.

This Post:
00
155542.5 in reply to 155542.3
Date: 8/29/2010 2:57:37 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
Do you know the passing skill of this player? It could be average passing or less which would easily explain why he doesn't get a lot of assists. In his last 5 games (scrimmages included) he has got 9, 15, 5, 7, 12 assists. And when he got the 5, 7 and 12 assists he was only playing around 35 minutes.

So he is still getting a pretty high amount of assists.

This Post:
00
155542.6 in reply to 155542.2
Date: 8/29/2010 3:13:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
8080
In my expierence most teams don't have great passing and offensive flow so their team doesn't get many assists.
Also, a lot of teams play outside attack tactics rather than inside attack tactics and in my opinion/experience you get more assists for players when you play an inside oriented tactic.

I believe you're right and in fact I have been thinking about this.

My hypothesis is that it is more complicated to compare the effect of passing compared to most other skills. For instance your rebounding can easily be compared with the oponents rebounding in order to calculate the likelihood of getting a rebound. Likewise for inside defense compared to inside scoring and so on. But, passing is harder to analyse and therefore people can't valuate it and choose to go for players with skills that they "understand".

The consequence of that of course is that players with passing skills becomes less attractive then they should and therefore less frequent as you say.

This Post:
11
155542.7 in reply to 155542.6
Date: 8/29/2010 3:18:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
Exactly. Rebounding and points are easy to see on the boxscore and can be directly associated with an increase in skill. So higher rebounding skill will show more rebounds and a user will notice this because rebounds are easily quantifiable. However, passing is different because the only real measure of passing we have is assists. But you need to keep in mind that there would be a lot of great passes that are made but the player that received the ball gets a turnover or misses the shot and so the pass doesn't count as an assist. Consequently, a lot of really good passes don't get shown on the boxscore at all because many times the shooter will miss, and so players think that passing is overrated but it is actually a very valuable skill to have.

This Post:
00
155542.9 in reply to 155542.8
Date: 8/29/2010 3:23:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
You can't count that player either lol.
His salary is so high because he is just a passing machine. Rest of the skills are probably crap.
And he is playing on a bot team lol.

This Post:
11
155542.10 in reply to 155542.8
Date: 8/29/2010 3:24:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
296296
A real man until he gets to the free throw line :P

Nice looking player, but Shaq like from the stripe!!

This Post:
00
155542.11 in reply to 155542.5
Date: 8/29/2010 3:25:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3333
It'll be prominent or higher most likely. I have players with respectable passing who don't average close 4 APG. At least he's producing 6 a game. Whereas a player with prominent or higher rebounding would be pulling down over 15 boards a game.

To stajan: Could it be that managers haven't trained passing as much because it didn't seem to pay enough dividend? While rebounding did, for example.

This Post:
00
155542.12 in reply to 155542.11
Date: 8/29/2010 3:30:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
I don't think it would be prominent. Possible, but seems high. Unless he has very little OD in which case it makes sense. The player's rating is pretty low though.

As I said before, when you collect a rebound you automatically add 1 to your total rebounds. This isn't the same for passes. You have to make the pass and the other player has to score.
So maybe his team just needs to score better.

This Post:
00
155542.13 in reply to 155542.12
Date: 8/29/2010 3:37:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3333
Its the highest scoring team in the league. Well over 100 points a game. And they even shoot a high % which is rare. :)

Surely such a team should have a PG averaging close to 9-10 APG.

Advertisement