BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Nationalize Leagues

Nationalize Leagues

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
162689.3 in reply to 162689.2
Date: 10/29/2010 12:57:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
what if when people join after you make a lineup, will you forfeit the game because of to many foreigners in your team?

And about in general, i don't like it. Becauseit takes away the chanches of small nations in international competion, and for some of those teams in small nation the BBB is the highlight to play competive games because the other teams still need time to catch up.

Also most teams, tend to lineup a llot nationals because of the positive effect of merchandise already.

Last edited by CrazyEye at 10/29/2010 1:02:55 PM

This Post:
00
162689.4 in reply to 162689.3
Date: 10/29/2010 5:11:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2020
what if when people join after you make a lineup, will you forfeit the game because of to many foreigners in your team?


Yes.

This Post:
00
162689.5 in reply to 162689.4
Date: 10/30/2010 5:11:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
i imagine that is pretty funny for countrys like Belarus, who are around 100(+/- 5) players since a while.

This Post:
11
162689.6 in reply to 162689.1
Date: 10/31/2010 2:49:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
152152
No way the only reason, my team is any good(undefeated0 is beacuse of foreigners. I think this is a bad idea. The "punishment" for too many foreign players in BB currently is low merchandize and I think that's good enough. No need to force managers to be "racist".

Check the Suggestions they are important
This Post:
11
162689.7 in reply to 162689.6
Date: 10/31/2010 2:58:46 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2020
If you put 5 players as reserves in your own country
5 players can align community.

the drawback that I see this this system is this:

BuzzerBeater is based on the NBA.
In the NBA, no player limit community.
In the European leagues do.

but no NBA team that plays with 100% of their players to be foreigners.

In BuzzerBeater yes.

With this system, it would give more importance to your drafft and repeat users who would cost them more repeat title.
Also, cost more to stay in higher divisions.

But I think lately BuzzerBeater seeks greater benefit for lower league teams.
With this change, the league would be favored low.

Last edited by Henrych at 10/31/2010 3:04:15 PM

This Post:
00
162689.8 in reply to 162689.7
Date: 10/31/2010 6:42:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
237237
There is already enough punishment on teams that don't have local players by the form of lower merchandising revenue.

Yes you say the draft is important but you fail to realise that successful teams that gets to pick 12-16 gets jack all in the draft and most likely just sack the players rather than train them. Why would anyone in the top leagues want to train a player of bench warmer potential?

This leads to having to buy local players from the market. Sure the players might be there, but how often do you really find a player from your country that really suits your complete needs? It becomes way too restrictive on what teams should and should not do. And what about the smaller countries with low player base? Players from their nations will hardly be on the market to begin with.

This Post:
11
162689.9 in reply to 162689.8
Date: 10/31/2010 6:49:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
209209
You already get more fan support from having local players. That, in itself, is a big enough incentive to have players from your own country.

"Air is beautiful, yet you cannot see it. It's soft, yet you cannot touch it. Air is a little like my brain." - Jean-Claude Van Damme