Perhaps he plays well. But perhaps you're misusing him in this case as well. He averaged a higher game score than the other guys at his position but always took fewer shots than at least one of the guys he was backing up. If he's truly better, then wouldn't you want him in a position where he's taking more shots, even if it means relegating him to one spot per game?
And also, the first 2 games were blowouts, and he got right at 30 minutes. (Starter's minutes for a blowout). But in the closer game(the third one there) he only got 22 minutes while having a game score par to his norm despite your coach using 8 players (instead of the 10 he used in the other two). So unless you know you're gonna dominate in your game the tactic doesn't seem to work as desired. And if you're gonna dominate regardless it doesn't tend to matter if you have minor lineup quirks...
edit: also if he was just better defensively and inferior offensively to both players that could be the case that he should be taking less shots. But it doesn't point to much about minute distribution that you're going for based on those 3 games to me still
Last edited by boilerman013 at 5/8/2011 4:59:14 AM