373 online at 22:02:25

BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Anyway to implement trading?

Anyway to implement trading?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
190147.3 in reply to 190147.1
Date: 7/21/2011 12:32:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3030
You would just get 2 managers from 2 different countries working together. I'm not sure that could possibly be implemented.

This Post:
00
190147.4 in reply to 190147.1
Date: 7/21/2011 12:40:33 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
182182
You mean there are no international friends?:)

!zazhigai!
This Post:
11
190147.6 in reply to 190147.5
Date: 7/22/2011 6:14:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2727
I have your post convert it in english but Google translate could not detect your language!

Last edited by Siam Dau™ (NT Coach Prathet Thai) at 7/22/2011 6:15:00 AM

From: Phantum

This Post:
22
190147.7 in reply to 190147.5
Date: 7/22/2011 7:07:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5050
Well I think this is the only post in this topic that really makes sense..

This Post:
00
190147.8 in reply to 190147.2
Date: 7/22/2011 5:31:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
I believe your trying to say that since you cannot see the skills of a player that it screws up my whole idea right? Well an easy solution would be to have a trading block. When you put a player on your trading block his skills are visible to every other player in the world except for the teams nationality of GM's. IE: My players on the trading block would have their skills visible to every other manager except for Canadian manager. GUYS! Doesn't this make alot of sense? It could work!!

This Post:
00
190147.9 in reply to 190147.3
Date: 7/22/2011 5:35:00 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
I find this to be very easily spottable though. I mean if there are alliances between 2 "International Friends" thats okay" But if people are hiring their Jamaican friend to make an account and trade all his jamaican assets to a team this could be moderated well and all unreasonable trades could be undid.

Last edited by DonutDunker at 7/22/2011 5:35:27 PM

This Post:
00
190147.11 in reply to 190147.10
Date: 7/22/2011 10:58:09 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
And the side effects with the system i suggested are..?

(Not saying there aren't any just i believe the dimension of trading being added to the game outweighs the possible cheating loophole..which i still believe is very slim given the restrictions I've suggested)

This Post:
00
190147.12 in reply to 190147.5
Date: 7/23/2011 12:26:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
Did you mean scepter? or sphincter?

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
190147.13 in reply to 190147.11
Date: 7/23/2011 3:30:40 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
And the side effects with the system i suggested are..?

(Not saying there aren't any just i believe the dimension of trading being added to the game outweighs the possible cheating loophole..which i still believe is very slim given the restrictions I've suggested)



You need too players with the same value(or packages), wo both GM desire the one from opposing team i think at least that it rare - which lead to mostly unfair trades for one side or just waist of time looking through the avaible players.

And i miss the advantages, from a trade betwen selling a player you don't want anymore, and reinvesting that money in a player you want from avaible player from 50.000 teams instead one which should raise the likelihood that you really want him.

Advertisement