BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Tactical question

Tactical question

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
199085.3 in reply to 199085.2
Date: 10/21/2011 3:23:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3939
thanks for the response
his SG-PG shape are not great either, but still, it is better than the big guys have...

This Post:
00
199085.4 in reply to 199085.1
Date: 10/21/2011 10:19:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
246246
If you are a good rebounder, I'd go with 3-2.
If your PG and SG can work with an inside ofense, go for it. Now, if you haven't tried it, PO it's not the time for "research", right? If his shape is bad, M2M and rng could be the best combo, especially if you have homecourt, enth and a deeper team.-

Hope it helped!

This Post:
00
199085.5 in reply to 199085.4
Date: 10/22/2011 9:54:01 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3939
I've decided not to experiment in PO as you said, so I went with 3-2 and positional offense. I hope his shape is really that bad

This Post:
00
199085.6 in reply to 199085.5
Date: 10/22/2011 1:53:21 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
246246
He beat you, crap.

It was a very hard match. Analyzing it, all you could have done is play with patient and probably lose by 10/15.

Your PF and C got 15 rebounds combined, his PG was the top scorer. Now you know what you have to do next year:

- Improve your PG/SG OD
- Improve your rebound

Test inside attacks next season, and remember to use slow pace tactics on offense when you face superior teams.

See you.-