BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > a limit of player Salaries

a limit of player Salaries

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
208245.3 in reply to 208245.2
Date: 2/6/2012 2:40:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5353
Assume that the limit of player Salariesthe for 1.300,000.
I think that B3 will become more interseting.

This Post:
00
208245.4 in reply to 208245.1
Date: 2/6/2012 8:45:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
There is a huge difference between limiting the salary each player can get and a Salary-cap.

The first just lowers the salaries, and by that giving another advantage to those old teams.

Salary-cap, on the other hand, make the game more competitive, as all will have (almost) the same value of players.
Of course that a proper definition is needed in order of allowing new teams to be able to pay that amount and still to improve their team's future revenue. and on the other hand, not to make it just about them and allowing the richer teams on each division able (but less) to compete on B3.

There are few suggestion threads on that topic that I've opened.

This Post:
00
208245.6 in reply to 208245.5
Date: 2/13/2012 4:10:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
Turbato, one of the best player in BB, has been sold for 276k to a IV Spanish team with only 2 players.


Wow, I totally missed that one - almost made me puke.

In a few seasons owners might have to pay to get rid of those players...

This Post:
00
208245.7 in reply to 208245.5
Date: 2/13/2012 1:52:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
So one will get much more skill for much less money???
Not sound the right way to close a deal.

In case one keeps improving a player, and cannot pay him, he should decide whether to fire/sell him, or others.

He also can decide to train him less, and don't get to this situation.

In any case, there should not be salary reduction, unless his salary is above something (any) team could pay.
On those case, it means that the skill cap should be changed, and not the salary for those players.

This Post:
00
208245.9 in reply to 208245.8
Date: 2/13/2012 2:21:44 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
105105
Another argument in favor of opposing the "salary reduction" is that as lower division teams cannot afford all of the players in the market, the same should be the case with higher divisions' teams.

From: Manouche

To: Bill
This Post:
00
208245.11 in reply to 208245.5
Date: 2/13/2012 5:05:14 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
699699
A player like Turbato has had his salary cut by a third already if not more.

Where do you put a limit ? How much is acceptable ?