BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > What kind of player should he be?

What kind of player should he be?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: Eagle

This Post:
00
211901.3 in reply to 211901.1
Date: 3/2/2012 6:29:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
8989
SG. It takes way too long to train a SF and you'll need to place him in PF/C which will affect your games (not so much if he plays SG). IMO it is best for you right now to focus on saving money, building your arena and hopefully you'll promote.

Last edited by Eagle at 3/2/2012 6:30:11 PM

From: E.B.W.

This Post:
00
211901.4 in reply to 211901.3
Date: 3/2/2012 7:18:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
26152615
Actually putting him at Center for games wont matter at all because im in a V. league where I crush every team i play but 20+ points on TIE

Murray/Harris/MPJ/Grant/Jokic - 2020 NBA Champs
From: Eagle

This Post:
00
211901.5 in reply to 211901.4
Date: 3/2/2012 8:41:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
8989
Yes I notice that you are undefeated, just my opinion :) As long as it doesn't affect your games, go ahead and get his inside skills up.

Last edited by Eagle at 3/2/2012 8:42:36 PM

This Post:
00
211901.6 in reply to 211901.1
Date: 3/2/2012 9:16:36 PM
Aussie Pride
ABBL
Overall Posts Rated:
545545
For me a SG with some inside game. Good when playing LI. Rebounding is too low to make him a SF in my opinion.

From: Lucifer

This Post:
00
211901.8 in reply to 211901.7
Date: 3/3/2012 8:12:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
108108
Even in LI, I would want him to have at least 10 JS and 8 JR. IMO passing and driving don't have to be that high, seriously, even in LI, a guard takes quite a bit of shots from Outside.

"Falling in love is not at all the most stupid thing that people do but gravitation cannot be held responsible for it."
This Post:
44
211901.10 in reply to 211901.1
Date: 3/5/2012 1:22:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
Retire him, or at least dont waste any time on training him.

Guy has more holes in his skillset than swiss cheese.

From: Koperboy

This Post:
00
211901.11 in reply to 211901.1
Date: 3/6/2012 4:14:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
I would go for SF. Why?

You have Pitiful RB, but all skills related to RB are much higher, so elastic effect will take care of that. I predict you would probably get 5 pops in 7-8 weeks of training RB. Some may say it's not worth the time and you should make him a SG, but do you know how slow will JR and OD train on 196cm guy? You won't notice it in his first two years, but later it will become quite a burden.

In outside skills he lacks shooting and in inside skills, he lacks RB. So it's up to you, but I would make him a balanced or inside SF. Especially because of his low potential.

Last edited by Koperboy at 3/6/2012 4:15:15 AM

This Post:
00
211901.12 in reply to 211901.10
Date: 3/6/2012 5:07:19 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
108108
lol more holes than swiss cheese

"Falling in love is not at all the most stupid thing that people do but gravitation cannot be held responsible for it."
This Post:
00
211901.13 in reply to 211901.11
Date: 3/6/2012 8:54:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
I would go for SF. Why?


Dont BS the threadstarter. JS is the most expensive skill for an SF, I guess there is a reason for that.

The player mentioned has INEPT JS, fixing this leak will take two full seasons of training. And then you have a twenty year old dude that has no ballhandling skill (turnovers galore) and no rebounding - yeeeeha!

When I started this game I had the idea of training my 6'6 C trainee to become a SF, took me six seasons and then he ran out of potential. Dont waste your time on below terrible rookies!

Advertisement