BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Game Shape - WTH

Game Shape - WTH

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
270505.3 in reply to 270505.1
Date: 5/15/2015 2:25:57 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
5353

my game shape updates have been decent, surprised 1 player stayed at strong and didnt get proficient but other than that 1 incident everything seemed okay.

Usually 60 mins or getting 48 minutes exact is the sweet spot for a +2 or a general rise.

well you'd know this.

so i dunno.

carry on.

This Post:
11
270505.4 in reply to 270505.3
Date: 5/15/2015 3:52:26 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9999
Stamina Kids

From: Big BO$$

This Post:
00
270505.5 in reply to 270505.1
Date: 5/15/2015 6:18:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
239239
If I remember correctly, they said that something was done to game shape couple seasons ago so, that players with decent stamina would get advantage over guys with low stamina. I may be wrong, though.

Whatever the case, I agree that there's something weird with GPS, particularly in the beginning of the seasons; my starter played 77 minutes and 63 minutes on last two weeks, but his game shape still lags at respectable despite of his respectable stamina.

This Post:
00
270505.6 in reply to 270505.5
Date: 5/15/2015 8:27:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
Idk if stamina is the problem. The player I have that played 65 min last and stayed at average GS has the highest stmina on my team.

This Post:
00
270505.7 in reply to 270505.1
Date: 5/16/2015 6:29:26 AM
Woodbridge Wreckers
DBA Pro A
Overall Posts Rated:
14331433
Maybe he has high sublevel of gameshape and it's not so bad. Look at his dmi.

This Post:
1010
270505.13 in reply to 270505.12
Date: 5/16/2015 8:28:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8181
This is a horrible way of testing. There will always be outliers if chance is involved, but outliers are seldom identical.

You are trying to compare one outlier to an older outlier. This does not make ANY sense from a statistical point of view.

It's funny to see that apparently it is up to Marin or Perpete to prove you're wrong. So now they are guilty because you say so until they can prove otherwise? Wow, that's great.

How about you take the effort to compare a number of teams and create a statistically valid sample mean. And compare that to previous seasons. If then there is reason to believe you are right with your allegations, I bet we all would be a lot more happy to talk. Now it's just empty words.



Last edited by Bolleboosje at 5/16/2015 8:29:32 AM

Advertisement