BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > (1, 2) 3 Player training

(1, 2) 3 Player training

Set priority
Show messages by
From: boule

This Post:
00
294348.3 in reply to 294348.1
Date: 6/9/2018 3:06:54 PM
Boulettes
III.10
Overall Posts Rated:
20582058
Second Team:
Les Boulettes Utopiennes
If you do 6 players training rather than 3 you have to use at every game 2 players that needs training. Also it can be done but it does not help for a balanced team. And at the end of training you have a bunch of simiilar player that may not be very helpfull in a competitive division.

I did it a few season back with a group of young players and raised them close to 20 OD from 4 OD. But then again all my offensive players where from a previous training plan or bought. But that was really fun. Long but fun


This Post:
00
294348.4 in reply to 294348.3
Date: 6/9/2018 8:28:36 PM
Hemet Hooligans
III.16
Overall Posts Rated:
4646
I'm not planning to use it a lot, but i have used it around 20% to 30% of the time. I'm in division 4, so my competition is minimal. I have 16 players with salaries ranging from $5, 000 to $15,000 and my top 10 core have salaries between $9,000 and $15,000, and when i match up to teams that have 2 to 5 players with salaries in the $20,000 to $40,000 range and the rest around $2,00 to $8,000, i usually clean their clock, which leads me to believe that - to an extent - balanced teams with depth will beat out teams with just a few superstars. Now i have no idea whether that applies to teams in better divisions or not.

From: Apex

This Post:
00
294348.5 in reply to 294348.4
Date: 6/9/2018 8:53:45 PM
Atelier
IV.13
Overall Posts Rated:
421421
Upper divisions are more about strategy and game planning than salaries. Lower divisions are more about salaries. When you get higher up the difference in salary becomes lower so the overall impact of lineups and GDP becomes much greater. Whereas if a team is doubling your salary down in D4... you aren't winning no matter the GDP. Balanced/Non-balanced rosters are really up to you. Bigs are more expensive than guards though, so keep that in mind.

Past salary it's also Game Shape, if a guy is a 40k salary at 4 GS and another guy is 10k salary at 9 GS the 10k guy will likely perform better. It's to avoid teams stacking and just idling there.

2x NBBA Champion: S55, S56. 3x USA Cup Champion: S54, S55, S56. WR for longest home streak ever at 11 in Season 47.
From: MichTodd

To: Apex
This Post:
00
294348.6 in reply to 294348.5
Date: 6/9/2018 9:52:22 PM
Hemet Hooligans
III.16
Overall Posts Rated:
4646
Yeah...i'm always checking my (and opposing) teams DMI when figuring out my lineup.There seems to be a strong correlation between game shape and DMI.

From: Apex

This Post:
00
294348.7 in reply to 294348.6
Date: 6/9/2018 10:39:02 PM
Atelier
IV.13
Overall Posts Rated:
421421
It's more than a strong correlation, DMI = Game Shape x Salary. 9 GS is always constant for the number behind it, the rest are a range ex (8.0 - 8.9).

2x NBBA Champion: S55, S56. 3x USA Cup Champion: S54, S55, S56. WR for longest home streak ever at 11 in Season 47.
This Post:
00
294348.8 in reply to 294348.7
Date: 6/10/2018 5:33:43 AM
Dynamo J. Hradec
První liga
Overall Posts Rated:
493493
It's more than a strong correlation, DMI = Game Shape x Salary.


Have you ever tried to verify it on any player? According to it, my player Kopal has GS 16,7. Or salary 148 000. Neither is true.

(actual numbers are DMI: 1 335 900, salary: 80 140, GS: 9)

Last edited by NO-15 (Слава Україні!) at 6/10/2018 5:34:41 AM

This Post:
00
294348.9 in reply to 294348.8
Date: 6/10/2018 12:17:39 PM
Atelier
IV.13
Overall Posts Rated:
421421
It's not a flat formula like that, it comes from here:

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/forum/read.aspx?thr...)

Most of Josef Ka's research from back in the day still holds true, or has a level of truth to it.

Last edited by Apex at 6/10/2018 12:18:46 PM

2x NBBA Champion: S55, S56. 3x USA Cup Champion: S54, S55, S56. WR for longest home streak ever at 11 in Season 47.