BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > NT elections

NT elections (thread closed)

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
29601.3 in reply to 29601.2
Date: 5/9/2008 6:22:09 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
i understand what you are saying...but a newbie with a few days of BB don´t have enought knowledge to make is own team...why should he pick the NT coach?

Is not that important for him!

My suggestion is only for prevent a fair election...

This Post:
00
29601.4 in reply to 29601.3
Date: 5/9/2008 6:35:55 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
Also some "oldies" got not enough enough knowledge, but a newbie who follow the NT diskussion + read the rules could have enough knowledge to elect.


This Post:
00
29601.5 in reply to 29601.3
Date: 5/9/2008 9:37:26 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
i understand what you are saying...but a newbie with a few days of BB don´t have enought knowledge to make is own team...why should he pick the NT coach?

Is not that important for him!

My suggestion is only for prevent a fair election...


Why shouldn't he/she?

They have a team just like anyone else.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
29601.6 in reply to 29601.5
Date: 5/9/2008 9:50:25 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
99
I think that the most important thing to know is whether results (especially in small nations) are checked afterwards.

Just take a quick look at small nations elections forums, they are full of "I want to be your NC" posts, and that is fine because the "local managers" will evaluate them and see who is a good manager or not.

What on the contrary would not be fine is that someone wins the election with 1 vote (remember he cannot vote if he runs in another country) and an examination of the voter's IP reveals that the team was created in the country of the candidate and not of the country, and 5-6 days before the election...


This Post:
00
29601.7 in reply to 29601.6
Date: 5/9/2008 9:52:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Of course - we're not blind or anything.

But being excluded solely by dint of being new is just not realistic.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
29601.8 in reply to 29601.5
Date: 5/9/2008 9:53:11 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
That´s not the point. Off course everyone as the same rights!
I don´t discuss that point of view...what i´m trying to say is that we could prevent someone to take advantage in the elections using a rule of that kind...it could be another rule..if you want!

I think the problem exist...and we could prevent it...thats all

If you don´t think thats important...it´s ok...i think it is an important issue....because someone will take advantage.. and we will have more free agents in the future!


This Post:
00
29601.9 in reply to 29601.8
Date: 5/9/2008 9:55:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
There are other ways of preventing the kind of scenario you described.

Disenfranchising voters is not one of them.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live