BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Unnecessary players

Unnecessary players

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
311672.3 in reply to 311672.2
Date: 10/2/2021 1:38:57 PM
Hortatus
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
13071307
Yes, of course I was speaking only for bots, even if personally I would put a limit (maybe it already exists, but maybe it's so high that it doesn't bother anyone ..)

In any case, in the rosters there are always and in any case a maximum of 30 players; you can put them in order in various ways (name, surname, age .. etc ..), but always 30 .. making a very numerous roster even difficult to manage ..

Returning to us I would put a limit for the bots and even a little more than those necessary for the games .. or as I said before, put a "John Doe" with fixed characteristics (which do not snap) and whose shape does not need to update every week .. saving energy to the game ..

That is, only in the fifth Italian series, there would be like 350,000 useless players of bot teams who every week need updates that nobody cares about ..

This Post:
00
311672.5 in reply to 311672.3
Date: 10/2/2021 10:32:37 PM
Tampines Fusion
SBBL
Overall Posts Rated:
444444
Second Team:
ActiveSG Basketball Academy
Yes, of course I was speaking only for bots, even if personally I would put a limit (maybe it already exists, but maybe it's so high that it doesn't bother anyone ..)

Yea I was referring to bots to. My previous team is a bot team (and in another country, I still visit it from time to time xD)

But then, personal sentimental views aside, it would be a logical idea to have 30 players max and I agree that it theoretically should lighten the load of the servers. I assume it shouldn't be hard to just keep the top 30 highest paid players by the time salary updates (meaning anything after that is released). That should at least have some systematic way in releasing players, other than randomly releasing them.

Last edited by BuzzRBeater at 10/2/2021 10:33:19 PM