The points per 100 shots can be misleading. If the players in a position go 1 for 1, they would score 200 points per 100 shots.
Does it really go that way?
Let's take for example my latest match.
(6765207)I don't know how the free throws are considered in the calculations, but my SGs didn't shoot any during the whole game. They made total of 12 points with total of 15 FG attempts, which would translate into 80 point per 100 shots (12/15*100=80). However the "points per 100 shots" colums states that it would be 98.5 points.
If we compare that 98.5 of SGs to the 121.1 of PFs I fail to see why the big difference. My SGs shot 6/15 from the field (FTs 0/0) and my PFs shot 6/17 (FTs 3/4). Actually I fail to see why my PF "rating" would be higher than SG "rating" given that they shot worse from the field.
E: I checked from "weekly stats" that all my players had only played in one position each so that can't be the problem here.
Last edited by hoo-cee at 8/31/2008 5:29:29 PM