BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Wizards?

Wizards?

Set priority
Show messages by
From: /joao

To: ned
This Post:
00
82758.3 in reply to 82758.1
Date: 3/24/2009 10:28:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
33
Well, one thing I can talk about is your PF/C, the brazilian NT player. Yes, awsome player, but he is a center, not a small forward or even a power forward.

The consequences of putting Andrew Bynum at PF are:

1. weaker offense, because he would be forced to play not under the basket like he would playing at Center.

2. weaker defense, because he isnt actually capable of guarding PFs as well as he would at Center - even not so good PFs.

Ok, I also believe that there's some reformulation needed, but its kinda your fault.


From: ned

To: Coco
This Post:
00
82758.5 in reply to 82758.4
Date: 3/25/2009 4:08:16 AM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
Ciao dude ;)

Probably I created this thread putting only my match here but I'd like to speak in general about the Mr and Tr. I need to know why I've won or lost a game and in this moment the stats at the end of every match don't give me any precise idea cause often Tr and Mr are in "conflict" each other so imho BBs must be change Mr and Tr they are creating only confusion, if I remember well also BB-Forrest said that he doesn't like at all the actual way to "read the matches".
Are u able to understand clearly why you win or lose a match? O_o"
The thread "why I've lost this game" is full of message it means that it is quite difficult to understand the stats. Personally I've some ideas but often they are not supported by mr or tr so I'm not speaking about GE I speak about the way to read the match ;)

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
From: CrazyEye

To: ned
This Post:
00
82758.7 in reply to 82758.1
Date: 3/25/2009 6:27:54 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
whats mr and tr?

From: Thijs

This Post:
00
82758.8 in reply to 82758.7
Date: 3/25/2009 7:02:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9292
Matchup Ratings & Team Ratings.

From: CrazyEye

This Post:
00
82758.9 in reply to 82758.8
Date: 3/25/2009 7:08:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
thx

This Post:
00
82758.10 in reply to 82758.9
Date: 3/25/2009 1:47:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
I think that MR and TR should not be used to determine why you win or lose a game. They are average reflections of the skills involved in each game. They should be taken only as a basic performance evaluation. Why should this then not be taken as a determiner of a win or a loss? For example, let's say two teams are absolutely equal for an entire game except for a two minute stretch to start the 3rd quarter, where team A makes 4 straight three pointers. Team A outscores team B by 12 points in those two minutes. The final is a 12 point victory for team A. The TR and MR will still be basically equal.

I think that the overall box score and watching the game are the two best ways to tell why you wion or lose a game. Often times free throws, foul trouble, offensive rebounds, and/or turnovers are the factors in a win or loss, especially between teams of similar quality.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
82758.11 in reply to 82758.10
Date: 3/25/2009 2:14:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2121
I agree,especially in a first division with the teams at a similar level

sometimes a bad outiside defender PF can give the oposite side some points that you can't see in the ratings ,but watching games you can have an idea of the outside shooting of an Pf and some details like that

but I must agree that the ratings should be better,for exemple:sometimes the team with 1 or 2 levels worst in rebound has more rebounds in the game

sorry if I made some english mistakes

This Post:
00
82758.12 in reply to 82758.11
Date: 3/25/2009 11:25:25 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
Your English was fine. You have to remember that sometimes Kendrick Perkins outrebounds Dwight Howard.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
From: Heathcoat

To: ned
This Post:
00
82758.13 in reply to 82758.12
Date: 3/26/2009 6:25:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
I dont look at the MRs as gospel, but except for one sublevel of outside scoring both examples above you got beat in every rating. I did not watch the games, just looked at the box scores, but it seemed odd you are shocked you lost them both.

Advertisement