Even if you don't send scouts out you can see guys on TV or the internet.
This precise argument suggests that we should know WHAT AGE those players are without having to send scouts to look at them twice.
The draft sucks. Defending it with imagination does this game a disservice.
I don't see the "precise argument" involving age at alll:
The Draft results are not enough rewarding for those who spend a lot of money in it. A team that didn't spend any money in their scout can see the 20 results. Why do they have these results ? They didn't have any scout looking for youngsters, therefore they should have no result. Today, they are almost sure to get a not too bad player for their first choice (one that can be sold for money). So, it's all benefits for them. And a team who spend 40k per week in the Draft (600k in one season) should have all the info about the players. It's very difficult otherwise to have enough luck to get a player that will worth 600k. Almost better to buy one in the market.
There's a short reference to having all information available to those that spend $40K/week, and that's about it.
If I responded to your thread with what I said, then your response would make more sense. Here it's bashing me for God knows what reason.
NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live