BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > Ball Tracker

Ball Tracker

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
174569.30 in reply to 174569.29
Date: 2/21/2011 10:37:02 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
I agree, I am not a fan of average ball per post either.
Although, I wouldn't mind seeing a Total Number of Posts count.

This Post:
00
174569.32 in reply to 174569.31
Date: 2/22/2011 5:38:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
Why don't you like the ball system?
Do you prefer the old system with the 1 to 5 rating?
Or would you prefer no system?

This Post:
11
174569.33 in reply to 174569.11
Date: 2/23/2011 12:20:19 AM
Arizona Cacti
III.8
Overall Posts Rated:
276276
I've suggested why it might be a bad idea. So try and change my mind. This is how debate works.

Oh is that how it works? I thought the concept was just to shout louder than the guy you're debating against.

This Post:
00
174569.35 in reply to 174569.34
Date: 2/24/2011 4:39:42 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
Why not a ranking from "atrocious" to" legendary" based on a formula with "number of post", "ball posts", "Win/lose ratio", and "team rank" as variables ?
I know it's complicated but i think it's more realistic than the actual system.

I think that would be complicated, but if it could be done I like the idea. :)