BuzzerBeater Forums

USA - II.4 > Season 26

Season 26

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
251906.304 in reply to 251906.303
Date: 3/7/2014 5:32:56 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
Yea, that's one thing I'm worried about - the cost of a trainer is going to skyrocket in April. I really hope they expand the number of trainers on the market to offset it.

This Post:
00
251906.305 in reply to 251906.303
Date: 3/7/2014 5:48:57 PM
Smallfries
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
419419
Second Team:
Smallfries II
See, while I think it would be inefficient, we don't have any real info on how inefficient it is, if any. In my view, if you could train 6 guys to the efficiency of 95% of single position training with an advanced trainer then I think it's actually a good idea.

It really all depends on what your goal are though. For a team trying to be completely home grown it could be a good idea to get the most amount of players the most training.

This Post:
00
251906.306 in reply to 251906.304
Date: 3/7/2014 5:50:43 PM
Cassville Yuck
III.3
Overall Posts Rated:
555555
Second Team:
Yuckville Cass
I am actually considering a nice long extensive test to see the training speeds of a level one trainer. At least until trainers become affordable again

This Post:
00
251906.307 in reply to 251906.305
Date: 3/7/2014 5:53:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
32293229
See, while I think it would be inefficient, we don't have any real info on how inefficient it is, if any. In my view, if you could train 6 guys to the efficiency of 95% of single position training with an advanced trainer then I think it's actually a good idea.

It really all depends on what your goal are though. For a team trying to be completely home grown it could be a good idea to get the most amount of players the most training.


Aim for 5. Trust me. ;)

I'm probably going to be two positioning with a level 4 so we can certainly compare notes on how it turns out, though I'll probably be aiming for lower potential. The other thing to keep in mind is that we'll all be starting from scratch, so you'll need to have enough money to pick up the 5-6 trainees plus the trainer plus afford his salary (and take care of the arena building and stuff). Of course, I respect that you're trying to do something different and don't mean to sound like I'm trying to talk you out of it.

This Post:
00
251906.308 in reply to 251906.307
Date: 3/7/2014 6:07:34 PM
Smallfries
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
419419
Second Team:
Smallfries II
Haha well I won't be buying any trainees since ill be completely homegrown, so if I dont start with any young guys ill just be putting all money into draft and arena and not even getting a good trainer, at least until I get a complete draft class on my team.

From: Peluin

This Post:
00
251906.309 in reply to 251906.308
Date: 3/7/2014 7:52:24 PM
Visionaries
NBBA
Overall Posts Rated:
182182
holy cow, I completely forgot that new teams START WITH PLAYERS
when I made this account I had one guy under age 21 and one guy over $3k salary. And they weren't the same guy. I actually asked if I could delete and try again, and I didn't even know how to play... it was just so obviously horrible. I bet I do better the second time around lol

This Post:
00
251906.310 in reply to 251906.309
Date: 3/7/2014 8:22:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
There have been a few people asking on the forums if they are going to try and balance the starting positions of all the teams. That is, make sure every team has at least one trainable youngster and the teams have somewhat equal footing. It'd kind of suck for one team to get a team full of 4k-5k players and another to have all 1k-2k scrubs.

Last edited by tictacshack at 3/7/2014 8:22:15 PM

This Post:
00
251906.311 in reply to 251906.310
Date: 3/7/2014 8:56:00 PM
Visionaries
NBBA
Overall Posts Rated:
182182
yeah I asked BB-Charles that about 3 years ago back when we were in the same league he used to actually come on chat. I don't know why they think the way it is is acceptable but I've never seen any indication of considering a change.

New teams should have guaranteed two star/allstar 18yos, a couple "useful" veterans, and then fill out the roster with the current useless crap. But what do I know?

This Post:
00
251906.312 in reply to 251906.304
Date: 3/8/2014 1:23:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2020
Why do you think this is such a problem? We used to have 50,000 users and trainer costs weren't that much different.

This Post:
00
251906.313 in reply to 251906.312
Date: 3/8/2014 1:44:03 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9191
It's more that a whole bunch of users will probably be looking for a new trainer at more or less the same time. I've noticed that trainer prices tend to go down later in the season, once teams have their training regimes set up. Hopefully it will be the same next season and smart new teams will wait for a bit to get set up. Or maybe that lost time in training will put them behind the curve.

This Post:
00
251906.314 in reply to 251906.313
Date: 3/8/2014 3:28:06 PM
Cassville Yuck
III.3
Overall Posts Rated:
555555
Second Team:
Yuckville Cass
I am still unsure as to how many actually buy a second team. Maybe 500? A 1000? I don't think that puts a big surge on the market place especially since the new teams won't start with any cash and they don't get the four weeks of 50k.

Advertisement