BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Tanking

Tanking

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
218937.307 in reply to 218937.306
Date: 6/17/2012 9:44:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
299299
Ah k.

Yeah, and this is totally unacceptable in my eyes. If a DI team fields two players, there should be MASSIVE penalties. They are the top team in the nation. Fans flock from afar to see their favourite teams play... They're not gonna wanna watch 2 on 1 full court.

This Post:
44
218937.308 in reply to 218937.307
Date: 6/17/2012 9:57:28 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
More than 19k people showed up for this game. Since there wasn't a game played, people should demand their money back.

From: Kukoc

This Post:
44
218937.309 in reply to 218937.308
Date: 6/17/2012 10:24:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Since there wasn't a game played, people should demand their money back.
So I can sabotage my oponents income, with not fielding a team in an away game. No game no income from his arena:)
I still think they should force a lineup of atleast 5 players, if the team roster has that many players. Walkovers should only occure against teams with less than 5 players. Obviously a team forcing a walkover game, should not receive any income from the week that walkover occures (fines issued next economy update for merc, tv, arena income).

From: WFUnDina

This Post:
00
218937.310 in reply to 218937.309
Date: 6/17/2012 10:52:04 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
394394
Neither team fielded enough players. This not the same as a WO.

From: Bballin

This Post:
00
218937.311 in reply to 218937.309
Date: 6/17/2012 11:06:50 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
968968
I think if the rule were to be implemented where a WO game would force the home team to payback the fans(lose arena income), then to avoid any sabotage, if the away team is the team that forfeits then the away team would payback the fans(lose the same amount of money as arena income for the home team in that game).

From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
218937.312 in reply to 218937.310
Date: 6/17/2012 11:13:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
It does not matter, it's still considered a walkover as no game actually takes place. The point is, there should not be an option to deliberately not field players. If they can, then the penalty should be current weeks income.
Even if both teams do not field any players. They just lose out on training. The home team still get's stuck with a win.

Last edited by Kukoc at 6/17/2012 11:14:08 PM

This Post:
00
218937.313 in reply to 218937.309
Date: 6/17/2012 11:30:40 PM
Kitakyushu
ASL
Overall Posts Rated:
12351235
Nicely put...a ball for ya!!

From: Koperboy

This Post:
00
218937.314 in reply to 218937.309
Date: 6/18/2012 1:30:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
So I can sabotage my oponents income, with not fielding a team in an away game. No game no income from his arena:)


There is a very simple solution to this. The one who sabotaged gets to refund the people who bought the tickets.

From: Kukoc

This Post:
00
218937.315 in reply to 218937.314
Date: 6/18/2012 3:30:21 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
13361336
Double punishment in a week is not necessary...

From: Koperboy

This Post:
00
218937.316 in reply to 218937.315
Date: 6/18/2012 3:34:58 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
952952
Why punishment? If you'r playing at my arena and you don't field a team, no game is being played and I have to refund the people who came to watch the game. Since it's been your fault, I charge you the amount I had to give back to people. Seems fair to me.

Last edited by Koperboy at 6/18/2012 3:35:19 AM

Advertisement