BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Defense Strategy

Defense Strategy

Set priority
Show messages by
From: bull7

This Post:
00
10661.31 in reply to 10661.28
Date: 12/30/2007 12:30:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1515
Thanks for your help

This Post:
00
10661.33 in reply to 10661.32
Date: 12/30/2007 6:56:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
maybe this tactic worked because the opposition were pitiful rebounders?
If his rebounding was a couple levels higher your domination of the boards may have been less.

This Post:
00
10661.34 in reply to 10661.32
Date: 12/30/2007 7:25:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
Endconclusion, if you play TIE, you should play 2:3 Zone...


I tend to do that myself, but it's much too simplistic to say "if you do tactic A, you should always also play tactic M"

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
10661.35 in reply to 10661.22
Date: 12/30/2007 7:29:07 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
20382038
with your weak perimeter de(awful high in your example)the most teams destroy you..2-3 Zone is only an option if your guards know what defense is..two examples for my thesis..in both games i am bader but i won the games..and my points stepped up in both games..(1036691),(1036752)

thats my 2 cents

Cheers Tom





Edited by TomStar (12/30/2007 7:41:00 PM CET)

Last edited by WillFreeman at 12/30/2007 7:41:00 PM

From: ned
This Post:
00
10661.37 in reply to 10661.36
Date: 12/30/2007 9:21:03 PM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
I think you didn't consider that is important to compare attack and defense but is important to consider also the rebounds. I've seen few games won by teams that had a minor percentage of rebounds and following the rules you've better chances to win the rebounds if you play 2-3. I still don't know how much should be the gap between attack and defense to cover the missing rebounds.

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
This Post:
00
10661.39 in reply to 10661.36
Date: 1/1/2008 1:06:55 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
9696
Somebody said, the perimeter offense is too weak to hit 3 pointers.. so the tactic was to give them the open shots and it worked quite well...


you got lucky.
if the other team choose an outside attack, and fielded a few players with average jump shot and average shotrange or better (and there are many players around with these abilities) you might have swallowed a decent amount of 3-pointers.
Maybe ho would only get 40%, but still, if he takes 30 shots from outside, sinking 40%, that would be 36 points in 3-pointers.

I would never safely asume that what anyone says in the forums is the truth. I might believe it, and try it out, but I will always have to see for myself before taking it as a truth.
I am not convinced the players at this time are not capable of scoring 3-point shots. I played some outside offense a few times already, and am prety pleased with it...
Especially now that many teams are negecting outside D because there are no shooters yet, there are good possibilities out there...

They are not your friends; they dispise you. I am the only one you can count on. Trust me.
This Post:
00
10661.41 in reply to 10661.40
Date: 1/2/2008 10:08:11 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
You got the 2-3, 3-2 mixed up. A 2-3 is good against a good inside offense and 3-2 is good against a good outside offense.


Advertisement