BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > How important are SFs?

How important are SFs?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
175811.31 in reply to 175811.29
Date: 2/27/2011 4:40:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
How do you think if a SF only have Lv.10 both IS & ID , Lv7 RB?
Is it too bad for inside skill?

This Post:
00
175811.32 in reply to 175811.31
Date: 2/27/2011 4:43:18 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
205205
If you want to play inside offenses, it might be a little insufficient. However,for outside and balanced offenses that's good enough.

You will need good rebounders on the PF/C slots though to cancel his one real inside weakness.

This Post:
00
175811.33 in reply to 175811.31
Date: 2/27/2011 4:47:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
14651465
It really depends on the level of competition but here in Australia division II if you had a Sf who was say around sensational JS and OD, prominent JR HA DR and PA, then added the prominent ID and IS he would be fantastic even with respectable RE. Like someone else said just make sure your other players are decent rebounders.

This Post:
00
175811.34 in reply to 175811.33
Date: 2/27/2011 5:17:16 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
But...What level of reboundl should a good bal SG have? Lv10?
But my SG's potential is perennial allstar. It may not enough...=,=

This Post:
00
175811.35 in reply to 175811.34
Date: 2/27/2011 6:02:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
205205
a balanced SG doesn' need more than respectable rebounding. srong won't hrt, but it's not necessary. For a SF, proficient is the minimum in my view.

This Post:
00
175811.36 in reply to 175811.35
Date: 2/27/2011 6:44:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
~,~.....................It seens too high for me...

Last edited by THUNnder at 2/27/2011 6:45:11 AM

From: pmfg10

This Post:
00
175811.38 in reply to 175811.37
Date: 2/27/2011 7:29:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
206206
Salarywise it's another story..

From: iwen
This Post:
00
175811.39 in reply to 175811.38
Date: 2/27/2011 7:42:50 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
345345
I usually train in cycles, I trained my SF as a C initially, for 2 seasons, then for the next 3 seasons I trained him as a PG, training 2 other PG's at the same time. Then I sold the other trainees, and trained my SF at C again for another season, now I'm training guards again for the last 2 seasons and have 2 great NT prospects alongside him at PG/SG (since I'm training scoring now).

It's been a rough ride, but at the age of 24 I can finally play him at SF and easily slide him over to PF/C when required. Hope to stop his training at 26... will be glad it's over.

Then have to find his heir...

From: Johnson

To: iwen
This Post:
00
175811.40 in reply to 175811.39
Date: 2/27/2011 8:03:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
5151
I'm training 3 SFs and I can afford to play them any position because of the the league I'm in. I'm going to train them 1-position for 3 seasons, mostly in defense, and then move to 2-position training for about 2 seasons which will cap them out I think.

Do you think it's better to spend an entire season training only inside or outside, or to train a little bit of everything each season?

This Post:
00
175811.41 in reply to 175811.40
Date: 2/27/2011 8:05:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
205205
if you proceed the way iwen does, it's better to train season-wise. In your case, however, you can do whatever helps your team more - at least until you promote.

Advertisement