BuzzerBeater Forums

Bugs, bugs, bugs > Defense bug?

Defense bug?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
24361.31 in reply to 24361.30
Date: 5/5/2008 2:59:15 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
I think that whole 2nd game was completely bugged.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
24361.32 in reply to 24361.31
Date: 5/5/2008 3:03:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
lol. The dutchies blew you away hehe. (although you prolly hadn't any enthusiasm left)

Btw I don't think the bug is in the engine code, I think it is a presentational error in the written defensive ratings / word ratings.

The outside offense of the USA is respectable (medium), and our PD is average (medium). But when you check the points per 100 shots you see that our guards kind of blew them away. Both guards of the USA are around 70 pts per 100 shots, while the written ratings say the outside scoring is 1 full level higher than our defense.

I think our defense should be around proficient/strong, but due to the presentational error in the written ratings it says average(medium), but the pts per 100 shots show that our guards defense was better than their offense.



Last edited by BB-Patrick at 5/5/2008 3:04:45 PM

This Post:
00
24361.33 in reply to 24361.32
Date: 5/5/2008 3:25:40 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
303303
lol. The dutchies blew you away hehe. (although you prolly hadn't any enthusiasm left)


Roughly .0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
24361.34 in reply to 24361.33
Date: 5/5/2008 3:27:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
Ah not even under 0, nothing to whine about then

This Post:
00
24361.35 in reply to 24361.34
Date: 5/9/2008 12:53:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
I hope you can check this up in your special bug fix day ;). Because I think there really is something wrong with this tactic / shown ratings.

This Post:
00
24361.36 in reply to 24361.35
Date: 5/9/2008 12:55:39 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
225225
I hope you can check this up in your special bug fix day ;). Because I think there really is something wrong with this tactic / shown ratings.

Yup, I agree. Though I was initially suspicious, it does seem like perimeter defense zones don't work as intended. Or at least don't seem to visibly affect the OD ratings.

"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."
This Post:
00
24361.38 in reply to 24361.37
Date: 5/9/2008 1:24:53 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
Yeah in my previous posts i've posted a few examples and my thoughs.

My thoughts are that the tactic does work as intented, but it's another presentational error in the written ratings.

These two games (2 games after eachother) are the best examples I think.

(1422) normal, man-to-man, strong(medium) PD
(1456) normal, 3-2 zone, average(medium) PD

and here is an explanation about these matches (24361.30) (24361.32)

This Post:
00
24361.40 in reply to 24361.39
Date: 5/9/2008 2:14:20 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
506506
Hmm my examples are all of NT matches indeed (because I rarely play 3-2 zone)

But the topic starter, who was the first to adress this problem, used club matches as example. So I guess it affects both of these.


Advertisement