BuzzerBeater Forums

A big NO from me for this suggestion. It would just ruined the game and give users too many options for cheating. I vote 0/10

I don't see how it increases cheating. Right now users can choose to play the game straight up or cheat. You get caught cheating and you get banned. Pretty simple only sometimes these cheaters fly under the radar for awhile before they are caught.

With 2 teams per user there will be a couple of new rules added to the mix that will also carry bans with them if broken, only now it will be 10 times easier to spot those cheating because everyone knows which 2 teams any particular user owns. It will be public knowledge. Plus if you get banned in this instance you also lose the supporter $$$ you've invested.

It would be pretty simple to add one line to each team/owner page linking the 2nd team run by that owner.

I honestly think that cheating is the least of the problems with this suggestion.

Last edited by Beener not Beanerz at 1/2/2014 11:39:04 AM

I honestly think that cheating is the least of the problems with this suggestion.

I completely agree with this statement.

Wow, and you need a second team to be happy, because you can't make anything in your country or what is the reason to have 2 teams?
The same mistake they made on hattrick, now there should be thousand players playing in micronations? Do they people want to play with users from other countries? I Don't want play with users from other countries in my league as an example.
10 seasons after that I play in my league in Bosnia with 2 guys from Germany, with 1 guy from Italy, 1 from USA, 3 from China and etc, are you kidding me?
How should my forum look like? I want to play with people from my country! Not in a world league.

Hope BB-s stay cool and don't make this mistake, there is no reason to have 2 clubs, to make a lot of people unhappy because some guys are unhappy with their teams and they want to go in smaller nations to get some success.

1 more example, they will be an invasion to the micronations, Bahamas have 7 active users now, a lot of people chose those countries with low number of users to go, in 10 seasons there will be let's say 500-1k or more people there, so Bahamas could be stronger then Portugal, Spain or whatever, this is a bad joke.

And it's not easy to get all those cheaters with 2 clubs, trust me ;)

Explain this to some users from those micronations, they must play in their II or III league when they have 10-20-30 active users, why? Because people like you are bored with their club, they go in other countries and kick away those people from their league.

My team play B3, with this suggestion I make an team let's say in Malta, I won their league too and my 2 teams play one vs other in B3? Bad joke too.

I say it again there is no reason to allow players to make 2nd club. This is a game where you have your own team.

Regards

Wow, and you need a second team to be happy, because you can't make anything in your country or what is the reason to have 2 teams?

It was only a suggestion so I'm not sure why you're acting like a dick about it.

My main goal for suggesting this was clearly stated in my opening post. Whether I own one team or two I would like this game to hang around for a few more seasons but right now it's slowly creeping toward extinction.

Is that all you read in my post? As I see yes. Instead of 2nd club you should get some manners, forum is not a place to talk like that.

And in your post I didn't find a reason to have 2 clubs at the same time.
The game just need some marketing - more active users, that's all, you see the solution to allow something that's forbidden, and I don't see it on that way.

I have so many reasons again that, your argument is just bored, the game is creeping or etc? Come on..

Even though I am not a supporter, I support this idea. Buzzerbeater could eaisly make it possible that your two owned teams under the same account couldn't bid on players of their same team. Great idea, will influence supporter, will help Buzzerbeater grow in the long run.

Furthermore, we could allow as many teams as you want, but you have to pay for each of them.

I don't care about making more teams, but I want BuzzerBeater to get money and improve.

He may have come across a bit harsh about the situation but you have to admit that he has a point. I personally wouldn't want to be playing in a league with 3 Chinese managers, 2 canadian managers, a Japanese manager and a mix of many other nations, when it is a better atmosphere and easier to have fun forums with just manager from the same country as you I think. Most of the aspects of your idea are really good! There is just the issue of the B3 and I'm not sure how many people would be thrilled about pretty much merging all the nations together and have different managers from all countries in one league. I certainly wouldn't want the USA top league to look like that and I don't think you would want Canada's top league to look like that either.... So pretty much, great idea, but there are a couple problems that can occur with it.

This is why I like leaving all the countries how they are. That's the way it is.

If you want a second team, fine. Group them all together in a special BB land and may the best win.

Fine if you want the easy way out.
Don't prefer competition?
Join up and start in Division 1 or play one easy season and promote?
I don't get where the fun is in that.