BuzzerBeater Forums

If you never make it to WR 250, you're doing something wrong. Or you play just for fun and to waste your free time. It's OK. Skill manager? Where, in III or IV league, with bot teams or half active teams playing always the same?

All this success you talk about for so long...I mean I like you and all but its BS. Your teams do well because they aren't facing real competition, not because LI isn't overpowered at your level.

You don't need LI in DIII because you don't need to be any good in DIII. If you were any good...you wouldn't be in DIII anymore.

If you are any good below WR 250...you'll get up to WR 250...your team should steadily climb the ranks over time.

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/team/30851/schedule.aspx?seas...)

I topped out at WR 110, though I really only claim a max of 127 because that's what I was at before my last two competitive games with my active roster. I was #5 in the USA when I got run out of the Cup in the final four. I had a PL win over the WR #7 (though he ran inside isolation rather than LI that game). And the season before, I was 22-0 in USA II.4, and missed on promotion when my PF at SF picked up two technicals late in the third and I ended up losing by two points.

So excuse me for being accurate, but I think 22-0 in the second best league in the USA while WR 250 and better with an outside offense literally qualifies me to say exactly what I said. I don't claim to speak for B3 level competition, but likewise the two of you have literally no room to dismiss my opinions for never reaching WR 250 when, you know, I kind of blew by that.

That's nice, was a fine team you had, for a II league. If new guys want to make to this point and no more, they can play every tactic with every kind of players, it's fun.

But we have a different opinion about a word success.

Winning a national Cup, 1st League, play B3, go far, top10 WR, no1 why not, that's success for me.

My Cup final S32 vs a B3 finalist.

(87480151)
I won 1p with Princeton vs inside tactic, but I hit 2 GDP and he missed the inside prediction, still I win just by 1 point, and we had similar teams.

So you need epic luck, hit both GDP, he need to miss his, to be 50-50 when you play some other tactic vs inside.

If I played this match LI, hit 2 of his GDP, and he predicted I'll play balanced or outside, you know what would happened?
I would won it 20-30p.
Hope you get the point.

If you want to be of the top, you have no other way atm, it's sad, but true, inside vs all.

Ofc, everybody have his own opinion, I respect that, but people just need to go to top teams of BB and look their matches, like Mordor, how do he get 3 times in row B3 champ? He had all players like all-round beasts, he could play every tactic he want with that players. But does he played an another tactic then inside?

If you look better, everyone predicted his Inside tactic, everyone, cos all know that he play it, and all those hit predictions doesn't matter, cos the strenght of Inside win close to always.

Cheers mate

If any manager wants to hear about how to build a outside shooting team that stops any offense for any level just send me a mail!

And when you build that team send me a message to beat that team with my LI reserves.

I'm tired about those rants.

Yes, LI is very powerful.
Yes, the 3-2 isn't as effective as it should be, but come on !

Each time someone comes with an alternative, explains his standpoint, you just assume he is wrong and you can only be right.

Saying you won by 1 playing princeton and woiuld've won by 20 playing LI : well yes of course, your team is built for LI !

When most players on the market are built for LI, when assembling a high SB high JR team is impossible because those players have to be homemade and thus you can't get to the highest level with'em. (too many formation cycles to assemble a whole team)

So stop saying the only way to win is LI, this is what is making it worse !



Last edited by flixbob at 4/5/2016 5:31:12 AM

Nope, my team was build by all-round players. You really think you can be no1 WR and win 22 trophys in your 1st league with "Inside" players or how you imagine that?

Just one question for you, how do look like an Inside team? So you said when I was at my top, I had an inside team? How do my players look like?

I'll give you an quick answer, my Inside players could play in most of the teams on BB on outside positions, without problems. So does it make my team outside team? Why do I play Inside then? hmm

Those players look like best SF-s on the world, and they play on all positions, like a C with JS 16, 14 OD, 18 DR HA, 13 PA and etc. ( just an example)

It's a myth that best teams are build for Inside tactic, teams are build normal, with extra skills for primary , and really good secondary skills, so players look more and more like SF-s, the more secondary skills that batter.

But they all play Inside tactic, cos it works so hard, over power.

oh come on, look at mordor's team and tell me it was'nt built for LI...

oh come on, look at mordor's team and tell me it was'nt built for LI...

Yes I look at it, carefully, and? Outside players have Inside skills, Inside players have Outside skills, what's wrong with it, he could play any formation on BB, any, and he choose just one. Guess why?