i would like to know if those ideas to increase the revenue would mostly advantage top teams and help them stay above everyone else or if the teams in lower would still get a shot at becoming the best teams ?
I basically addressed your question in my above post:
(312180.30), but to summarize:
I believe that by fixing the salary inflation, by any means deemed necessary or appropriate (i.e. raising the salary cap, lowering player salaries, or a mixture of both), this will help lead to a more competitive and balanced economy, because more managers would be able to afford the weekly salary of any particular player which would help drive up a players transfer list value.
Moreover, with the 8-man rotation being enforced, B3 managers and all manager alike, would need to pay for three additional roster spots instead of simply paying five 160+ TSP players and no depth players.
In theory, they would be at a competitive disadvantage if they were to play three scrubs as substitutes during a B3 match. And of course by substitute players, I mean, the three depth players would need to be slotted in the 'backup' positions and not just simply dressed as reserves that won't receive any game minutes.
Just to add to that: if salaries were to be lowered, I would like to see a more balanced approach where salaries reflect TSP rather than individual skills, more or less.
"You will lose." -Ivan Drago