BuzzerBeater Forums

Suggestions > BB Is Really Starting to Siphon the Yolk

BB Is Really Starting to Siphon the Yolk

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
90900.31 in reply to 90900.25
Date: 5/21/2009 11:07:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
196196

Monthly ticket prices--I like the fact that I can make my own mind up about what I'm charging at the gate, but I don't like the 1st of the month restriction. Seasons don't start and end (and promotions and relegations don't take place) on the first of the month, so why should changes in ticket prices?



It should be ajustable game by game....


The trouble is there is such a steep difference for just a $1 movement.

Bleachers $13-14 is enormous. I am almost convinced I would be best to pitch at $13.50 but that is not an option.... (by the way im not asking for the increments to be changed to include cents) I would 2nd the game by game....

This Post:
00
90900.32 in reply to 90900.31
Date: 5/21/2009 11:27:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3838
I would disagree.. I like the 1st of month because it's a bit of a tactical gamble... raising when you have a couple of "easy games" (or at least you consider them as easy) and you think you'll have a winning streak, lowering when you lose...
and for all you "reality" people : would you want the tickets to the games of your fav club to change every week? you would never know what you will have to pay... and what about the season ticket holders? if prices drop every game then they would feel cheated out of a large sum of money

This Post:
00
90900.33 in reply to 90900.32
Date: 5/22/2009 4:26:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
I still would opt for moments that collide with season structure:
Changing ticket prices at start of interconferential round, end of interconferential round, PO-start and end of season.

Climbing the BB-mountain. Destination: the top.
From: ZyZla

This Post:
00
90900.34 in reply to 90900.32
Date: 5/22/2009 5:02:52 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
I would disagree.. I like the 1st of month because it's a bit of a tactical gamble... raising when you have a couple of "easy games" (or at least you consider them as easy) and you think you'll have a winning streak, lowering when you lose...
and for all you "reality" people : would you want the tickets to the games of your fav club to change every week? you would never know what you will have to pay... and what about the season ticket holders? if prices drop every game then they would feel cheated out of a large sum of money


as they are not buying season ticket for now it no harm towards them (= if they would buy them and we would get money from all the amount they bought at the start of each season so I would agree that we would be able to change tickets price during off-season and all-stars, so it would be twice per season... for now I would agree on every two week term on Sundays, but not the 1st of month.

ZyZla - ZyZlūnas ZyZlavotas ~c(=
This Post:
00
90900.35 in reply to 90900.33
Date: 5/22/2009 5:03:49 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
I still would opt for moments that collide with season structure:
Changing ticket prices at start of interconferential round, end of interconferential round, PO-start and end of season.



I like your idea as well...

ZyZla - ZyZlūnas ZyZlavotas ~c(=
This Post:
00
90900.36 in reply to 90900.1
Date: 5/22/2009 5:17:29 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
22
I agree 100% with the draft and 10000% with training SF.

It is impossible to train a SF..

This Post:
00
90900.37 in reply to 90900.33
Date: 5/22/2009 6:52:44 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
I still would opt for moments that collide with season structure:
Changing ticket prices at start of interconferential round, end of interconferential round, PO-start and end of season.



I freaking love this idea.

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
This Post:
00
90900.38 in reply to 90900.30
Date: 5/22/2009 6:56:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
744744
but then again, who the heck cares about draft collusions?
I mean, bah, it's just a very stupid thing to worry about.

the overall draft experience is pretty much useless/annoying right now, a total rehauling should be put in place. what's the point in having a draft where 33% of the players should be playing curling?


QFT

I've always wondered why they were so concerned about two managers talking about the players in the draft.

Open up nearly any league conference thread about the draft and you'll see how many 5* players people are seeing. Is that collusion?

The problem with the draft is not that there could be cheating. The problem with the draft is that the majority of the players drafted aren't fit to sweep up the locker room, much less put on a uniform.

(http://www.buzzerbeater.com/community/fedoverview.aspx?fe...)
Keep your friend`s toast, and your enemy`s toaster.
This Post:
00
90900.39 in reply to 90900.38
Date: 5/22/2009 11:08:34 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
304304
The collusion worry is that those that pay the $40K (or whatever) for scouting then can share the info with those who do not pay anything.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
90900.40 in reply to 90900.39
Date: 5/22/2009 11:09:43 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
304304
As far as the draft goes, I wouldn't mind seeing a system where the more you put into scouting, the better chance you have of getting three new players (without the draft mechanism - you just simply get three new players).

But I'm not against the current system either.

NO ONE at this table ordered a rum & Coke
Charles: Penn has some good people
A CT? Really?
Any two will do
Any three for me
Any four will score
Any five are live
This Post:
00
90900.41 in reply to 90900.40
Date: 5/22/2009 12:34:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
or there could be something like that then you get list of players at the end of season with all the skills and choose 3 of them.

40k full season 6 players on the list

20k full season 5 players

10k full season 4 players

5k full season just generate better players for you, then if you would pay 0

0k full season players would`n be good maybe just one of them worth something

it`s just an idea which should be developed more better... But the point is that teams don`t scout same schools or universities or something so nobody have same players scouted.

ZyZla - ZyZlūnas ZyZlavotas ~c(=
Advertisement