BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Canada > Canadas National Team!

Canadas National Team!

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
248500.319 in reply to 248500.316
Date: 9/4/2014 7:55:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
146146
Guevin, Macindeor, Trotter, Laverdue, Sobuza or something. I'd personally call up the best guys because any young high potential players who are well developed will be NT fixtures for like 8+ seasons pretty soon.

This Post:
00
248500.320 in reply to 248500.319
Date: 9/4/2014 8:49:27 PM
Pszczyna Team
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
233233
Dont they gain experience for that though making them better players once they are actually rready?

This Post:
00
248500.321 in reply to 248500.320
Date: 9/6/2014 5:39:35 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
146146
Marginal I guess. I dunno, do whatever you want.

This Post:
00
248500.322 in reply to 248500.321
Date: 9/15/2014 11:33:11 PM
Pszczyna Team
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
233233
well, that was a major fail..... didnt play blank lineup to try things out for next season.
It didn't turn out very good. I will actually post on the off-site before next week's game (and after GS update) because setting a lineup can actually make for a good discussion.

This Post:
00
248500.323 in reply to 248500.322
Date: 9/16/2014 10:30:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
146146
I'd keep trying the iso thing to try making some sense of it.

Couldn't learn much from this week, but odd signs IMO. Bizarre that Stronks would go 1-6 with 46 pp/100 in 41 mins at SG (you'd think 20+ shots at 100+ pp/100) and Hudgins/Hall 5-14 with 79 pp/100 against a respectable GS starting opponent in inside iso (you'd think much better, though Hudgins' actual stats weren't bad). I don't think GS affects offensive output and if that's the case, this would be another example of iso being inexplicably bad.



Last edited by Stajan at 9/16/2014 10:30:30 AM

This Post:
00
248500.324 in reply to 248500.323
Date: 9/16/2014 2:15:25 PM
Pszczyna Team
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
233233
I dont think its bad. The problem is that besides Stronks and Hudgins (bad GS) we dont have guards for it. I was seriously considering starting Stronks at PG and Gaudreault at SG, but need a guy with great JR there

This Post:
00
248500.325 in reply to 248500.323
Date: 9/29/2014 1:12:16 AM
Pszczyna Team
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
233233
Ok guys, next week I will try to begin scouting, and hopefully by next sunday i will put up a depth chart on the new offsite. This way we will be able to start discussion early

This Post:
00
248500.326 in reply to 248500.2
Date: 9/29/2014 7:44:04 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
323323
why don't you use the new offsite.

This Post:
00
248500.327 in reply to 248500.326
Date: 9/29/2014 11:14:53 AM
Pszczyna Team
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
233233
I will for the depth chart and starting next season

This Post:
00
248500.328 in reply to 248500.326
Date: 9/29/2014 3:00:32 PM
Pszczyna Team
II.1
Overall Posts Rated:
233233
Recent wins against Ecuador and Poland pushed us back into top 10 of world ranking (friendlies do count toward that, just less than competative games). It helped that we had much more enthusiasm than our opponents. I can either schedule another strong partner and bump it up even more, or I can start scouting early, drop enthusiasm, schedule easier oppoennts (or harder but just lose games trying out different tactics), and start discussion about next season's roster early.

I am leaning toward option #2 so not all of the work is congested within one week, but I will let everyone state their opinion

This Post:
00
248500.329 in reply to 248500.328
Date: 9/29/2014 3:50:45 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
296296
Option 2 makes the most sense and gives you a better work load spread.

Advertisement