BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Is one level always one level?

Is one level always one level?

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
113010.32 in reply to 113010.31
Date: 9/25/2009 1:39:16 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
Or maybe it is even simpler than that. Maybe instead of a difference it is a sum:

-for inept vs awful:
(4/(4+3))=57% chance shot goes in

-for 15 vs 14:
(15/(15+14))=51.7% chance shot goes in


Run of the Mill Canadian Manager
This Post:
00
113010.33 in reply to 113010.32
Date: 9/25/2009 1:55:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
2828
yes, I think this is more close to the experience that I got.

low and mid lv differences are more clearer than high.

This Post:
00
113010.34 in reply to 113010.32
Date: 9/25/2009 8:31:34 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
409409
Well maybe is a sum. The thing is that it is a form to compare offense with defense.

I do not think that it is like you stated in the way that here we are not considering a lot of things. But maybe the .57 and the .517 you get maybe used in a much more complex formula. That is a possibility.

What I really try to take as a learning is that skills do have decremental performance. And that is something that we as managers should somehow take in consideration when taking critical decisions like training and the use of player market.

Last edited by Zero, the Magi. at 9/25/2009 8:55:44 PM

This Post:
00
113010.35 in reply to 113010.34
Date: 9/25/2009 8:33:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
155155
Yep, I think what I said is definitely a simplification. Maybe a big simplification - because somehow team ratings also have an effect. And also, I think there is more than one offensive and defensive skill involved in every play.

Run of the Mill Canadian Manager