BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > What would be better

What would be better

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
143014.32 in reply to 143014.31
Date: 5/7/2010 10:56:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
312312
I agree that there probably needs to be greater risks associated with tanking, as it does sound as if there is probably too much incentive for a team to shoot for finishing 6th over 5th and not enough repercussions. Although this is only my first full season, and, personally, I'd love to finish 5th so I don't have to worry about being relegated back down to Div V.

Another option, in addition to the ones you brought up, might be to have the two 5th place teams in a league play each other a home-away series during the playoffs. That way each 5th place team does get two games during the playoffs for training and some arena revenue. Although perhaps that would result in people tanking from 4th to 5th, as 4th place likely doesn't get too much from the playoffs unless they can pull off a bunch of upsets.

This Post:
00
143014.33 in reply to 143014.13
Date: 5/7/2010 8:22:42 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
77
I've got a very simple solution to this problem.

All income from relegation games is equally divided among the 5th, 6th, and 7th place teams in the league, with no regard to who played in the game.

That would remove 99% of the incentive for tanking your way into a relegation match. (The other 1% is that you get a better draft pick.)

This Post:
00
143014.34 in reply to 143014.33
Date: 5/7/2010 8:58:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
296296
It would work.

I still prefer the relegation tournament as a format, but maybe the cash can be distributed evenly as well.

This Post:
00
143014.35 in reply to 143014.34
Date: 5/8/2010 3:41:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
522522
I think a better solution would be to give no money for relegation games at all.