BuzzerBeater Forums

Australia - III.15 > Season 17 - SEVEN new teams

Season 17 - SEVEN new teams

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
191164.32 in reply to 191164.31
Date: 8/10/2011 2:23:41 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
ahhhhhhh I see where you are coming from.

From a 'ive got 1million in the bank, im new in division III and ive got this current roster - whats the best way to spend my dollars' - perspective..... then yes, total agreeance. He could have bought two younger better trainnee's, or one awesome trainnee or spend on arena size, spent on an older 29 year old with similar stats and cheaper, to make him competitive in games, and keep him in Div III without sacrificing dollars for younger player... etc etc etc....his money could definately have been more wisely spent elsewhere.


Phew... glad we sorted that out! I was beginning to wonder if I had missed something really bloody obvious this whole time id been playing the game.







This Post:
00
191164.33 in reply to 191164.32
Date: 8/10/2011 2:27:07 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
exactly.


From: SN13

This Post:
00
191164.34 in reply to 191164.33
Date: 8/14/2011 7:58:33 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2525
I feel your pain, I lost to Team Thor, although Ididn't forget to set my lineup I just made it bad but still able to win.....


I didn't make my line up hard because I got Amee Allstars and a tough tournament game coming up, so I thoguht I'd go easy on Team Thor, but still win....

Damn....

This Post:
00
191164.35 in reply to 191164.34
Date: 8/15/2011 10:29:06 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
yer its always tough that. You know inside out, how well your team plays when its full strength, but knowing how well it plays (or technically speaking, how badly) when it isnt full strength, is a tough thing.

and its hard to determine how good the newly promoted teams will play. Especially if they decide to CT.




This Post:
00
191164.36 in reply to 191164.35
Date: 8/15/2011 6:05:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
286286
I hate CT!! humph!!

This Post:
00
191164.37 in reply to 191164.9
Date: 8/22/2011 7:44:22 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
i know you posted this ages ago, i was just re-reading some stuff today.

This

the guys got good starting stats , rebounding is nice and low which is good .


Im interested to know why low rebounding is good for a guy that could be a PG/SG? I would have thought opposite? Rebounding doesnt affect salary that much for a PG/SG, and with it being so low, its going to have a negative affect on the 'elastic-theory' in training?

So im just curious, ... why is it good? Not questioning it, just trying to understand the theory behind it. trying to steal your knowledges mwa ha ha

This Post:
00
191164.38 in reply to 191164.37
Date: 8/23/2011 6:17:53 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
Rebounding doesnt affect salary that much for a PG/SG

i suggest you look into this abit more , because its completely wrong :)

rebounding lv 1 on a high end guard salary could be 60-80k
rebounding lv 7 on a high end guard salary will be 80- 100k

at low levels you dont notice the difference much but high end guards its going to cost you alot for little output.

its much better to have that extra pop on a high end center/pf then these pops on a guard.

This Post:
00
191164.39 in reply to 191164.38
Date: 8/23/2011 7:29:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
ahhhhhhhhhhh interesting, did not know this.

i will do some more investigating. cheers for that.


This Post:
00
191164.40 in reply to 191164.39
Date: 8/23/2011 11:37:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
yer when you get up higher every penny counts :)

ill be chilling for a few seasons down here i think while i train some guys up , so i wont have to worry to much about that

This Post:
00
191164.41 in reply to 191164.40
Date: 8/24/2011 10:28:19 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
766766
how fascinating. i checked this out on buzzer-manager because he has a cool salary estimator.

i.... seriously....cannot believe....how much REBOUNDING... of all the stats..... how much of a difference in it makes with a PG/SG.

Yet Inside shot? nup. nothing. nil. nadda. (obviously to a point, then it might start making a difference)

this just seems.... well.... for lack of a better word. stupid? i dunno... just doesnt seem correct to me. im sure there is logic behind it though. somewhere.


This Post:
00
191164.42 in reply to 191164.41
Date: 8/24/2011 11:50:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
217217
yer its somewhat stupid .

and inside shot will never cost a thing for a pg/sg - untill there classified as a sf/pf

Advertisement