BuzzerBeater Forums

Help - English > Why so high? Oh no ...so low

Why so high? Oh no ...so low

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
235860.33 in reply to 235860.32
Date: 2/13/2013 1:47:59 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
246246
wolph said u cant train with lvl4 coach for profit,i proved it wrong.
u are forgeting about merch money,its not big but it covers the trainer when u have a guy in u-21 NT.i do agree that if u are training a guy for your team that u need secondaries but u are not selling that guy.
and if u are pointing on me stagnating in d3,i can buy a roster that will dominate d3 and stay alive in d2 without problems,but thats just not my priority,why?my economy balance and my gym are not big enough to win in d2 so why would i even bother promoting and fighting to stay in d2 when i can save money and be patient(nobody wants to pay relegation penalty right)

From: LooKA

This Post:
00
235860.35 in reply to 235860.34
Date: 2/13/2013 5:27:31 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
246246
From the experience i have with u21 players the merch bonus is not much to write home about. A few k at most is what i have noticed on my two own drafted players when playing in the u21.

its not much but it can cover the coaches salary
I dont know but 18k seats seems more then enough for D.2 to me. Even 19k is good enough to play in D.2 if you make sure to set your prices right and keep on adding seats while there.
A promotion sure seems like it would bring in more cash then sitting on a relegation spot in D.2. I dont know how tough your D.3 league is and what type of players you'd need but D.2 sure brings in a lot more cash then D.3. Just for an example: Typical Weekly Net Income: $ 242 957.


my gym got finished 2 days ago ;)
my plan is to go up for 2 seasons,maybe next but i dont really like that option as div 2 here is where people are most active and its more competitive than our div 1 :)

From: jonte

This Post:
00
235860.36 in reply to 235860.29
Date: 2/13/2013 5:48:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3333
my point or my question was if and how much primaries should suffer to train secondaries (see primaries 13 vs. 15)

From: malice

This Post:
00
235860.37 in reply to 235860.31
Date: 2/13/2013 6:44:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532

well i guess japan NT is on such awsome results when their 1st ranked player thinks this way but who cares about NT right
oh and srsly next time when u start counting go hit yourself maybe than a miricle can happen and u will understand what im talking about since i guess u are the only person on bb that doesnt understand that u can win a d3- games with primaries only but like ive said before thats because uve never played in d3- league.and just for the record,what do u think how did players looked like when bb started?u really think that somebody bothered to train secondaries?
and just for the record,i said anything about farms? u do know that croatian NT lost starting PG cause we dont have any? i guess u didnt know that.
again i proved everything ive said and all u do is shouting on the moon without any real example.
actually after ive red your post once again im 99% that all u have done ever is training ST/FT/GS

You're outta line bub.

But on your post: sure, you can win with primary-heavy players... but it would be a ridiculous situation to try and assert that you're better off doing so: either effect/financially-wise.
Long term, even in lower divisions, Wolph is absolutely right. Any lower division team is far better off sacrificing "winning now" for training a well-balanced player. The wins will come, and at a far more financially viable price if a player is well-trained. Add to that, you can get better performances from lower potential players - and get better financial gains should you choose to sell them.
This really isn't "opinion". This is... "fact".

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
From: malice

This Post:
00
235860.38 in reply to 235860.36
Date: 2/13/2013 6:46:17 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
That depends upon potential, and age. Not necessarily at all... if the potential's high enough and the age low enough.

Last edited by malice at 2/13/2013 6:46:36 PM

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
This Post:
00
235860.40 in reply to 235860.39
Date: 2/13/2013 10:51:43 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
246246
But if you are training for your U21 team, you shouldn't use a coach level 4.


u do know that difference is 1 pop per season when u compare lvl 4 and lvl 5 coach?
anyway im out,way 2 much theory talk here,i think i made my point,who wanted to understand,he did.

From: malice

This Post:
00
235860.41 in reply to 235860.40
Date: 2/13/2013 11:13:13 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
532532
But if you are training for your U21 team, you shouldn't use a coach level 4.


u do know that difference is 1 pop per season when u compare lvl 4 and lvl 5 coach?
anyway im out,way 2 much theory talk here,i think i made my point,who wanted to understand,he did.

Well... the flipside of what you're saying (and as you correctly, tho' unintentionally, assert): the higher the level, the better. That's not up for discussion. You can discuss the financial viability of it, but if you want to short-change your team, it remains your option to do so.
I'm quite happy to take my bonus pops per season.


In all honesty, I don't think you made much of a point at all, as it was fairly easily dismissed.

http://with-malice.com/ - The half-crazed ramblings of a Lakers fanatic in Japan
Advertisement