That's a given. Those who spend more time studying the game and tweaking their strategy should have the advantage, which is already the case as the game currently stands. Implementing more options simply increases the depth, and subsequently the overall fun factor of the game due to a wider variety of tactical decisions, placing more emphasis on managing skills, rather than the basic limited array of logical choices. I guess I'm just not intellectually challenged enough by this game.How exactly did you come to the conclusion that this game should be about micromanaging match tactics? There are plenty of other aspects of the game that are and should be equally important.The tactical options are adequate. If you don't feel challenged enough, maybe you should pay some attention to the strategic decisions necessary to manage a successful team.
That's a given. Those who spend more time studying the game and tweaking their strategy should have the advantage, which is already the case as the game currently stands. Implementing more options simply increases the depth, and subsequently the overall fun factor of the game due to a wider variety of tactical decisions, placing more emphasis on managing skills, rather than the basic limited array of logical choices. I guess I'm just not intellectually challenged enough by this game.
Eh.. I don't know about that. 90% of the game is basically setting up your player rotation, matchups and tactics. The rest is a cakewalk.
also a reserves team that plays against other second teams so more players get matches and can try and push into a teams lineup
but your proposal would make the lineup page probadly confusing(with 4 Lineups boxes) and this is especially against new users ... The positive effect ain't that big, maybe it becomes a bit easier to give your trainees their minutes(is that wished?), the blowout won't work anymore(what when the starting lineup is total different in the fourth?) and the tactical rea of the enemy getas more random then a fact of good scouting.
would be probadly more complicated, without more tactical deep ...For me it looks more random, then the actual system because it is nearly impossible to scout you opponent anymore ...
Ok now you could look from the minutes who gonna starting etc. Thats part of the minute management and posibel to see. .. With just to quarters as starter that was impossible. Even if you know your opponennt play one quarter r'n'g, one look inside and 2 normal you can't say when you had to play your zone defence... Today i look at the rooster look, who need to play and if he is an specialized player etc., so you could even predict players who don't play just one tactics with this change this become some part of impossible.And when you need 10 minutes for setting your lineup, and have a whole bunch of "setting" posiibilieties it becomes more complicated.