BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Changes in Season 10

Changes in Season 10

Set priority
Show messages by
From: BB-Forrest

To: ned
This Post:
00
93604.329 in reply to 93604.327
Date: 7/26/2009 8:07:44 AM
1986 Celtics
IV.16
Overall Posts Rated:
88
One thing to keep in mind in a zone is that players aren't stupid and aren't going to take well gaurded shots so just as in m2m you see your weaker defenders defend more shots, in a zone you will see weaker defenders/areas exploited. A zone will work well for you if it hides your weaknesses and your opponent is not equipped either tactically or personell wise to take advantage

This Post:
00
93604.330 in reply to 93604.323
Date: 7/26/2009 8:39:47 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
Sorry for the vague explanation. What I meant was that your PG for the game, Pacifici, is listed as a small forward. Because of this I assumed his OD would be slightly lower than a traditional PG. I didn't watch your game, so I don't know who he scored against, but their PG had a great game. He went for 50. What are you gonna do?

And as far as your SF for the game, Marchignoli, you gotta expect a player of Lamache's quality to be looking to take it to an 18 year old with a salary of $4150 a week. Especially in a 3-2 zone where he is responsible for guarding a wing by himself.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
93604.331 in reply to 93604.330
Date: 7/26/2009 8:47:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3838
This new GE is truly strange. Look what happened in my game in the half time break ;P

(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9oyr_MKABY)

This Post:
00
93604.332 in reply to 93604.331
Date: 7/26/2009 9:02:28 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
00
omg gold lol, love it

This Post:
00
93604.333 in reply to 93604.330
Date: 7/26/2009 9:22:00 AM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
Thanks ;)
I really don't undestand the % of Lamache and above all Mazzurana (lvl 14 in IS).
I will try to understand better the GE in the second match in this one for sure Marchignoli was my worst player on the parquet but it is also sure that Mahadi and Romagnoli aren't so bad in ID, so there is still something that I don't understand.

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
From: ned
This Post:
00
93604.335 in reply to 93604.329
Date: 7/26/2009 9:31:20 AM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
One thing to keep in mind in a zone is that players aren't stupid and aren't going to take well gaurded shots so just as in m2m you see your weaker defenders defend more shots, in a zone you will see weaker defenders/areas exploited. A zone will work well for you if it hides your weaknesses and your opponent is not equipped either tactically or personell wise to take advantage


Forrest thanks to try to help me but honestly I didn't get the sense of your post. If you analize the starting five only Marchignoli is really weak all the other players should be equipped quite well, we played the final cup last season with more or less the same players. So as written above even if Marchignoli was "sodomized" by Lamache, it's strange the % of Mazzurana, then, my personal opinion, I think that the defence m2m is the easier way to defend, the risk in this case is zero, instead if you defend 2-3 against r&g you make a big mistake, that's why I suggest you to improve the "power" of the zone defence the game will be more fun ;)

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
From: CrazyEye

To: ned
This Post:
00
93604.336 in reply to 93604.335
Date: 7/26/2009 11:31:35 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
one reason could be that his PG takes lot of shots against your SF, that this shots are most likely easy even if in the most sitution tronger defender is in his way and he pass the ball to other player till they find a missmatch ;)

But also i am thinking how to react for the real Zone. If it wise to play 2-3 Zone against run and gun, if you know your SF lacks in OD so that your stronger guard defend those shots?

This Post:
00
93604.337 in reply to 93604.334
Date: 7/26/2009 12:35:27 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
Why? If you had Bird, Parrish, and McHale on your team wouldn't you play them at the same time?

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
93604.338 in reply to 93604.336
Date: 7/26/2009 1:17:22 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
409409
one reason could be that his PG takes lot of shots against your SF, that this shots are most likely easy even if in the most sitution tronger defender is in his way and he pass the ball to other player till they find a missmatch ;)

But also i am thinking how to react for the real Zone. If it wise to play 2-3 Zone against run and gun, if you know your SF lacks in OD so that your stronger guard defend those shots?


You need to consider the fact that playing a 2-3 Zone will decrease the general quality of your perimeter defenders, also, R&G will improve the quality of his outside shoots plus It will also deviate more shoots to the perimeter harnessing this artificial difference created by tactics.

And I haven't make any speculation about the ball rotations of the R&G that might cause other "problematic" matchups that, again, will me magnified by the general Defensive/Offensive hole created by that particular tactical combination.

Because, a few more rebounds(and a small amount of offesnive ones from your rival) doesn't seems to be pay the incremented amount of points that your opponent is likely to score.

Not for most of the teams at least.

This Post:
00
93604.339 in reply to 93604.338
Date: 7/26/2009 1:22:12 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
959959
but the thing is to you like a OD 14+ player with handicap defend a opposing 3 point shot, or a Big Guy with OD 6-8 who get a bonus? So you had the possibility to hide him in the Zone, and let the guards do the dirty work - but maybe this i more a theme for a extra thread or the help forum.

Advertisement