BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Brainless scouts

Brainless scouts

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
106339.34 in reply to 106339.33
Date: 8/26/2009 3:07:32 AM
Kitakyushu
ASL
Overall Posts Rated:
12341234
I never scout before the All Star game. I always spend about 75,000 after that. I picked 7th last season and got a good player. I really do think that about $80,000 in perfect. In fact, I sold one of my draftee's for the same amount of money I spent in scouting. Everybody wants 18 year olds. peace

This Post:
00
106339.35 in reply to 106339.31
Date: 8/26/2009 5:50:31 AM
MightyMice
IV.37
Overall Posts Rated:
494494
Second Team:
CrazyCrabs

I understand that BB's wants:
- encourage spending money in scouting


Actually, the last time this issue was raised (i.e. the last draft) I was told 'are you crazy spending money in scouts when you're having such a good record?'... so I guess you're right in saying that this point is not in a high position in BBs' to-do list, and I totally agree with you on the fact that the scouting and draft mechanisms could be much more interesting and fun, but I think that the BBs really don't care if we spend money in scouting...


that could be...and would surprise me.

Spending some money is always reasonable imho, unless all others are bot's ;) You can pick a decent "star" and develop good players too: not all must be at maximum potential! I am very proud of my medium potential players!

This Post:
00
106339.36 in reply to 106339.33
Date: 8/26/2009 6:08:31 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
3838
Try with firefox or another browser, not IE.

This Post:
00
106339.37 in reply to 106339.36
Date: 8/26/2009 11:46:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
2222
hello, friends!
fortunately, i spent only 10k per week, for only 3 weeks!!!
i quitted spendind money in the nasty scouts ....
and, guess what?!
this year they brought me 3 5-stars players, who have been scouted twice..lol..

conclusion: really doesn´t interest a lot investing big amounts of money in scouting....
lool........

This Post:
00
106339.38 in reply to 106339.37
Date: 8/26/2009 12:17:41 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
3838
about the same as me then ;D Can't complain. Last couple of seasons have not been so good though. I am biased to the system as it is, and that makes it good enough for me.

This Post:
00
106339.39 in reply to 106339.38
Date: 8/26/2009 12:37:05 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
I am quite okay with this years draft list, but the scouting could have been much better, screenshot included.



http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/2844/draftd.jpg

This Post:
00
106339.40 in reply to 106339.35
Date: 8/26/2009 12:51:48 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
1010
that could be...and would surprise me.

Spending some money is always reasonable imho, unless all others are bot's ;) You can pick a decent "star" and develop good players too: not all must be at maximum potential! I am very proud of my medium potential players!


I understand your position, but I was told quite frankly (by BB-Forest, if I remember well) that the rationale of the draft is to allow teams having a low record to improve their roster, so basically you shouldn't invest in scouts if you're having a very good season.

Moreover, information provided by scouts is sketchy (what about knowing what's the height of a player? And how come I only know the age of a player if I scout it twice?) and draftees are often so unreasonable that only an unconstrained randomness could have created them (extremely tall PGs or too short Cs), and even if they have some respectable score (players describe with 4 balls, maybe with 3 or 4 balls of potential) they simply cannot even be trained to become a backup in an Italian IV serie... fired or sold for few bucks to someone that ended up firing them in a short time. I was quite lucky in season 4, 5 and 6, but it was pure luck.

I hope your experience is far better than mine, but I don't really expect anything from the draft anymore, since I have very little control of what happens. Maybe if I'm able to pass to III serie I'll throw some money into scouting, but it's just rolling the dices...

This Post:
00
106339.41 in reply to 106339.40
Date: 8/26/2009 1:46:12 PM
MightyMice
IV.37
Overall Posts Rated:
494494
Second Team:
CrazyCrabs
I agree that draft should allow re-balancing in medium term, as in NBA philosophy (they don't have different series however).

Scouts look like drunk... or at least blind! At the FIRST sight I would expect them to tell me if a player is tall or not!

Hope that after GE (still to be fully understood, intriguing), economy and site (very good), draft will be improved!

This Post:
00
106339.42 in reply to 106339.39
Date: 8/26/2009 3:07:38 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
182182
Quite fantastic result, congratulations. I'm thinking of putting a lot of empty rows first as every ok player (not close to 5 balls plus 5 balls but anyway..) I have is 19yo.:(((

Edit: If I was you, I'd put player 9 third or even second in the list!!

Last edited by D. Mirosavljevic at 8/26/2009 3:15:22 PM

!zazhigai!
This Post:
00
106339.43 in reply to 106339.42
Date: 8/26/2009 3:41:32 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
406406
Edit: If I was you, I'd put player 9 third or even second in the list!!


You are right, thanks for the tipp!

This Post:
00
106339.44 in reply to 106339.11
Date: 8/28/2009 9:02:20 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
55
My draft is seemingly top heavy with guards..

All of the 5* players I've scouted are guards, save for one C, and all the 4* are guards.

Out of 23 players scouted, 11 were 4* or 5* guys. My scouts did well on a cheap budget :3

I double scouted 6 people, the best being a 4*/4* PG who is at the top of my list.. And probably another one's too.

2 others were 5*, but they had 2* potential, and the other 3 were just trash. And I mixed around the unscouted ones to see if I could get lucky :'D

Advertisement