There are no sublevels on staff. Period. Those kind of strong statements really require some kind of back up, like a good motivation or referens to mean something. Do you have this?Yes, I will back him up - he is absolutely correct.
There are no sublevels on staff. Period. Those kind of strong statements really require some kind of back up, like a good motivation or referens to mean something. Do you have this?
There are no sublevels on staff. Period.
There are no sublevels on staff. Period. Those kind of strong statements really require some kind of back up, like a good motivation or referens to mean something. Do you have this?Yes, I will back him up - he is absolutely correct.I did not mean to upset someone. I just had some thoughts about why some stay longer on one level (Mr Key as 9) than others stay on another (Mr Ybarra as 10). Let us say, if there were a sub-level, then Mr Key came to my club so close to a 10-er as possible, and Ybarra, if there were a sub-level, must have started far below the top of a level 10. But as you say, I must see it is not like this. And then it's really strange that one trainer stay longer at a specific level than another ... well, well, programming is math and if there is longer between two levels than two other levels, then it is naturally to think of this as more steps (sub-levels) in between the one of them. I do NOT say there are! No! No!
Who got upset?
is there a possibility that a trainer even with a higher level could perform differently than other same level trainers?