BuzzerBeater Forums

What are your thoughts on current formula for rebounding for guards?

It ended up with guards being somewhat better off with as low rebounding as possible. For example Slovenian player Klavc has 19 Js, 19 Jr 20 Od. With atrocious rebounding, it made his salary quite good at only 176k. If his rebounding was, let's say 8, his salary would spike to even 274k.

There are some very interesting points being made here, things that we will definitely take into account when the time of change comes. Also, thanks for keeping things civil.

I think you've driven us where you wanted so now we know the best players to play and you need to rebalance the economy to compensate the benefits on the field of multiskills player.

Btw consider that we are on season 36 and the global economy seems not stable at all; if you wanna make the BB more funny you need to solve asap the details related to the economy (the debate of the micronations seems still "hot"), then give us more chances to play with different tactics. Probably is our fault but there are tactics that are not used, you needed to introduce the prediction cause the 80% of the teams played LI, maybe is time to describe better how princeton or box on defense are useful. Btw this is offtopic but believe me the economy should be a consequence of something not the beginning of something, you changed many times for many purposes and I'm pretty sure you'll have to change it again in the near future

With all the fuss and tweaking because of LI - and this one probably not being the final one - I assume, that removing the tactic from the game, would have been the much easier solution.

Just a question: Have they actually said what skills will be included and for what positions. And also how much they will contribute to the players salary?
I havent seen any of that yet and if anyone else has please link me to it. But what i'm saying is, do we really know that multi skilled players will be a LOT more expensive? Do we know all skills will be affected?
Well the answer is no to all those kind of questions. And Marin also said that the initial change will be fairly small. So i dont think we need to worry about teams going bankrupt over a single economy update.
Also that IS is free in the PG, SG and SF formula has contributed a lot to the kind of players that we see in top teams and one of the factors that have made LI as powerful as it actually is in this game.
To tackle that should be something every manager in the game should be wanting to see in order to actually get a more tactical game. Not just a game of who can splash the most money in their über LI-guards.

1$ could be a lot or nothing, just saying that they've to stop one day to change the economy and focus the efforts on other aspects of this game. So again, nothing against the news but once again they're using the economy to adjust something "wrong" (?). On season 36 I would expect to have a game well balanced, it seems not yet and ok to change it once again to make it more realistic/fair/funny what is bad is to use the economy to change your way to train and to play