BuzzerBeater Forums

Australia - II.1 > Season 18

Season 18

Set priority
Show messages by
This Post:
00
200146.344 in reply to 200146.343
Date: 1/14/2012 4:38:10 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
809809
Peter Nikolai Atwell (6742929)
Center
Owner: Learvins
Weekly salary: $ 203 026
Age: 29
Height: 7'3" / 221 cm
Potential: MVP
Game Shape: inept


what he hasnt realised is that there is only 1 more training update before the playoffs begin & no way that beast will be in good gs, he will be paying 200k but getting 100k

but still enough to deal with melts hopefully :P

still is he only cost 500k then i can afford to get a few

Sebastián González Pondal (5729964)
Shooting Guard
Owner: Learvins
Weekly salary: $ 157 388
Age: 30
Height: 6'1" / 185 cm
Potential: MVP
Game Shape: proficient


this is the guy i am more worried about

anti smeltz will be ineffective

anti xie just hit 46 on 18.5 rating

only $1 mill? he passes he rebounds he scores he makes breakfast

$#!+

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

in other matters the meateors vs ypb relegation series we r all looking forward to looks almost certain now i bet pabs is excited 2 see what radford can do to his old "buddy"


This Post:
00
200146.345 in reply to 200146.344
Date: 1/14/2012 8:11:08 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
in other matters the meateors vs ypb relegation series we r all looking forward to looks almost certain now i bet pabs is excited 2 see what radford can do to his old "buddy"

Why anyone thinks having a $300k+ player is a good thing is beyond me. How can 1 player do enough to make up for the fact you get dominated in the other 4 positions?

Unless ypb is buying more players to fill the holes, holtz will walk through and tell us how it was great management and how he tried to finish in the relegation zone knowing his opponent would put up even more of a joke than his outside heavy line up... Makes me sick!!!

This Post:
00
200146.346 in reply to 200146.345
Date: 1/15/2012 4:00:49 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8888
Why anyone thinks having a $300k+ player is a good thing is beyond me. How can 1 player do enough to make up for the fact you get dominated in the other 4 positions?

Unless ypb is buying more players to fill the holes, holtz will walk through and tell us how it was great management and how he tried to finish in the relegation zone knowing his opponent would put up even more of a joke than his outside heavy line up... Makes me sick!!!

A - buying randolf was not my intension. No way would I have bought him if I was thinking straight.
B - I have a player injured which now ruins my chances of beating his outside players effectively.
C - Unless meat buys inside players, I'm a chance.
D - Even if he does buy inside players, I'm planning to counter that.
E - Radford is on sale soon. Hey Learvins, got any spare change? lol
F - If vis beats you, or you let them win, both meat and YPB will go down (maybe)

Last edited by pete at 1/15/2012 4:13:10 AM

From: pete

This Post:
00
200146.347 in reply to 200146.344
Date: 1/15/2012 4:04:23 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8888
Peter Nikolai Atwell (6742929)
Center
Owner: Learvins
Weekly salary: $ 203 026
Age: 29
Height: 7'3" / 221 cm
Potential: MVP
Game Shape: inept


what he hasnt realised is that there is only 1 more training update before the playoffs begin & no way that beast will be in good gs, he will be paying 200k but getting 100k

but still enough to deal with melts hopefully :P



If he get past his first match up, that 2 training updates. Possible to get up to resp which equals the 200k but also possible to get it to strong.

From: abigfishy

To: pete
This Post:
00
200146.348 in reply to 200146.346
Date: 1/15/2012 6:16:24 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
809809
meateros 6 wins +63
vis 5 wins -494

meateors have last 2 gaves vs smeltz & bloods - sounds like 2 losses so end 6 wins +0

vis have cowboys -easy win & pwnage who could throw the game - would end on 7 wins -400

then meateros would have marmots & be in big pain



pwnage have 1 game on learvins and have games vs vis & steel

if they throw gave vs vis they need to beat steel to keep home court

learvins have 2 games left 1 vs bloods & 1 vs smeltz, probably will win both


tough call but would be really exciting

This Post:
00
200146.349 in reply to 200146.348
Date: 1/15/2012 6:36:11 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4949
smeltz is bringing in his own 300k monster!

"the labor party cant even spell surplus, let alone deliver one"
From: pete

This Post:
00
200146.350 in reply to 200146.348
Date: 1/15/2012 6:45:56 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
8888

tough call but would be really exciting

all about game shape at this time of the season. No matter if you are in the playoffs or relegation. You will want the best out of your players, therefor giving you the best chance. If it so happens I play a tougher team cause another decided to give their players a better chance in the playoffs and tank, then so be it. Hopefully, I get the team I prefer. Fingers crossed!

This Post:
00
200146.351 in reply to 200146.349
Date: 1/15/2012 6:55:46 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
809809
that is still my big call

drop a couple of million on some monsters & go 4 it even if the chance is <50%

or sit on the bucks & hope next season is easier

extra factor is some bad drop downs from abbl coming, zazz w 13 million, yoda w 8 million, hadders w a top 4 cup team, iwen w who knows 20+ million but may be tanking again so 1/4 good 3/4 disaster

thinking about all of them makes me want to roll the dice

lets go shopping :)

From: PTE_NGUYEN

To: pete
This Post:
00
200146.352 in reply to 200146.346
Date: 1/15/2012 7:39:17 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
4949
list radford for a 1 dollar mate, i'll buy him.

"the labor party cant even spell surplus, let alone deliver one"
This Post:
00
200146.353 in reply to 200146.351
Date: 1/15/2012 8:21:55 AM
Koopasaurus
II.4
Overall Posts Rated:
300300
lol zazz, yoda, hadders and iwen will all want to come back to the abbl asap for the 1mil promo money and yoyo up and down for a few seasons to to get that all time great aussie rookie.

I mean i would've done that too if I didnt already have 1 or 2 decent trainees.

This Post:
00
200146.354 in reply to 200146.346
Date: 1/15/2012 3:34:49 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
A - buying randolf was not my intension. No way would I have bought him if I was thinking straight.
B - I have a player injured which now ruins my chances of beating his outside players effectively.
C - Unless meat buys inside players, I'm a chance.
D - Even if he does buy inside players, I'm planning to counter that.
E - Radford is on sale soon. Hey Learvins, got any spare change? lol
F - If vis beats you, or you let them win, both meat and YPB will go down (maybe)

A- I am well aware the purchase of radford is not the actions of someone thinking straight... At the time of the purchase you said it was intentional and that you could plan around him. That tells me that although you weren't thinking straight, you were thinking as straight as you could.
B- Even without the injury, you would still need at least 1 more outside player to match him effectively
C- No, you are not
D- Not with what you have. And the purchase of radford makes me question whether you could manage the rational thinking to make it happen
E- The fact you haven't sold radford yet is proof you don't have the rational thinking to make it happen
F- I am semi tanking, but I do so for me. I don't tank to help or hinder anyone that doesn't improve my situation. Holtz did it to me seasons ago and I won't give him the satisfaction of sinking to his level... At the end of the day I'll just smash him again next season

Advertisement