BuzzerBeater Forums

BB Global (English) > Changes in Season 10

Changes in Season 10

Set priority
Show messages by
From: ned

This Post:
00
93604.347 in reply to 93604.340
Date: 7/26/2009 3:39:51 PM
Freccia Azzurra
IV.18
Overall Posts Rated:
823823
Second Team:
Slaytanic
so I would say a new era of R&G its coming to BB and look inside will lose his power, which was really too powerful, unless the inside teams have good SF with good OD and good inside skills.


I thought the same that you, look inside was better to play from outside, anyway I'd like to wait the second match, in that one my PG had lvl 19 in JS but his % was really bad and his SF doesn't have a lot of OD. I hope it was because I played look inside, we will see ;)

1990-2022 Stalinorgel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pV-Xppl6h8Et
This Post:
00
93604.348 in reply to 93604.347
Date: 7/26/2009 4:30:23 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
4040
Well, if this system benefits outside focused teams then I suddenly have a big obstacle placed in front of me in the middle of the season, considering I'm an inside focused team with poor outside defense, with my two main competitors being great outside shooting teams. Guess I'll have to restructure my team and hope to advance next season.

This Post:
00
93604.349 in reply to 93604.348
Date: 7/26/2009 4:42:36 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
916916
Its not that it benefits outside teams. Its that if you dont have a good SF, going 3-2 it will be for you really hard, i would not consider to restructure the team, its just that now is more balanced well at least i feel like it.

This Post:
00
93604.350 in reply to 93604.349
Date: 7/26/2009 11:57:30 PM
Overall Posts Rated:
465465
Wow, TV-contracts have brought much more benefit than earlier, but it's still a huge difference between the first and the second divisions ( in Russia - about 35000$), though my league is not much weaker than Russian Superliga. I think it's not fair especially when difference between 2nd and 3rd divisions is usually less than 15000$.

We are the ones who wanna play, always wanna go but we never wanna stay
This Post:
00
93604.351 in reply to 93604.344
Date: 7/27/2009 1:59:48 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
From my point of view, you are arguing to take away a viable strategy for teams with three good big men. I completely disagree that always playing three big men is advantageous. If you have three great guards and play FCP, you will get 20-30 steals. Should that be disallowed, especially if the opposing SF is a big man with poor handling skills?

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
This Post:
00
93604.352 in reply to 93604.351
Date: 7/27/2009 4:08:56 AM
BC Hostivař
První liga
Overall Posts Rated:
12341234
Second Team:
Jirkov
It’s not necessary to play FCP to have advantage about 3 big men. In old GE I played many times on SF player with ID 8 and high outside skills, especially JS, against big man on SF. I played Push the Ball and Man to Man (yes, it wasn’t necessary to play 2-3 zone) and SF was key factor for my win.

This Post:
00
93604.353 in reply to 93604.352
Date: 7/27/2009 6:11:38 AM
Overall Posts Rated:
459459
I agree completely.

Once I scored a basket that still makes me laugh.
Advertisement